The Punxsutawney Spirit

Here's why the UAE, the autocratic COP28 host, has to allow limited protests at the summit

- By Jon Gambrell

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Participan­ts at the United Nations' COP28 climate talks Sunday found themselves greeted by the rarest sights in the United Arab Emirates — public protests.

From the largest demonstrat­ion seen in the UAE since the start of the raging Israel-Hamas war to environmen­tal issues, activists allowed into the UAE can protest under strict guidelines in this autocratic nation inside the summit.

Meanwhile, human rights researcher­s from organizati­ons long banned by the country also have been let in, providing them some the opportunit­y for the first time in about a decade to offer criticism — though many acknowledg­e it may see them never allowed back in the country.

“One of our major issues with COP28 is the fact that the UAE government is using this to burnish its image internatio­nally and the fact that limited protests are allowed ... is a good thing,” said Joey Shea, now on her first trip to the Emirates as a researcher focused on the country at Human Rights Watch. "But at the end of the day, it helps to create this very false image that the UAE does have respect for rights when in fact it does not.”

The UAE, a federation of seven sheikhdoms led by Abu Dhabi’s ruler, bans political parties and labor unions.

All power rests in each emirate’s hereditary ruler. Broad laws tightly restrict speech and nearly all major local media are either stateowned or state-affiliated outlets.

Laws also criminaliz­e the very few protests that take place by foreign laborers. The Emirates’ overall population of more than 9.2 million people is only 10% Emirati. The rest are expatriate­s, many of them low-paid laborers seeking to send money back home to their families.

Many avoid saying anything as they see their livelihood­s at risk for speaking up as their visas and residencie­s remain tied to their employers. The UAE's diplomatic ties to Israel, reached in 2020, also make protesting on behalf of the Palestinia­ns that much more fraught.

However, the U.N. and the UAE agreed before COP28 that free expression would be allowed. Activists described a process of having to seek approvals with organizers for their demonstrat­ions. U.N. rules at the summit have seen demonstrat­ors avoid waving national flags or specifical­ly calling out countries.

But Sunday afternoon, over 100 people gathered as part of a solidarity protests on behalf of the Palestinia­ns, only a short distance from Israel's pavilion at Dubai's Expo City.

The same number of onlookers and journalist­s watched as they chanted, read names of the dead and held their fists up to the sky. Some cried as they listened.

Israeli security personnel watched from a distance. That morning, they briefly had argued over another smaller protest with United Nations police on hand guarding the Blue Zone, an area overseen by the U.N. where the negotiatio­ns take place.

Criticism of Israel’s conduct in the war has peppered much of the summit from world leaders, as well as activists who can be seen through the site wearing the traditiona­l checkered keffiyeh, or scarf, associated with the Palestinia­ns. However, unlike some other COP summits, there haven’t been marches of tens of thousands of people outside the venue.

Babawale Obayanju, an activist with the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice from Benin City, Nigeria, taking part in Sunday’s protests, told the AP that it was important to highlight the killing of civilians in the Gaza Strip as “it’s time for the world to take action” on that and the environmen­t.

“Every opportunit­y we have, every arena of this struggle is one that we must embrace,” Obayaju said. “And the COP is in that arena of struggle.”

The loosened rules for COP28 also appear to have extended to allowing in people the Emiratis otherwise may not have.

About a decade ago, as the Arab Spring protests wound down, the UAE cracked down on Islamists and dissidents in the country.

It also began blocking organizati­ons like Amnesty Internatio­nal and Human Rights Watch from having their staff visit the nation.

They included human rights expert James Lynch, at the time working for Amnesty.

He was blocked from entering the country in 2015 to talk at a conference about migrant labor.

Now the co-director of an organizati­on called FairSquare, Lynch said he sought and didn't receive a visa to attend COP28. After Emirati officials told The Financial Times nothing blocked him from coming, he took a nervous flight to Dubai with a copy of the article in his possession in case he was detained again at immigratio­n. He was not and spoke to The Associated Press from the summit.

“It’s obviously a good thing that the UAE is letting people in with it with a variety of voices and perspectiv­es, including critical perspectiv­es," Lynch said. "But neverthele­ss, ... it’s a nervy and sort of tense event in many ways.”

Shea's colleagues at Human Rights Watch hadn't been in the UAE in nine years after one of their colleagues was similarly detained trying to fly into the country. However, she said she didn't plan to work outside of the U.N.administer Blue Zone for her safety and those speaking with her.

“From the moment that COP28 participan­ts landed in Dubai, they were faced with thousands of security cameras, CCTV everywhere in public spaces, inside of buildings," Shea said. "You were effectivel­y tracked from the moment that you stepped down in this country, in addition to mass surveillan­ce” through suspected cases of authoritie­s hacking mobile phones.

For Alice McGown, a Los Angeles-based activist, the right to protest at COP meant dressing as a dugong, or seacow, holding a sign saying: "No More Fossils." But while looking cartoonish, McGown offered serious criticism of the Abu Dhabi National Oil Co.'s plans to expand its offshore ultrasour gas operations into a protected area home to the dugong.

“It's a little risky,” she said, as gawking onlookers stopped to photograph her. “Civil society does not have much of a place to speak out against these actions.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States