The Record (Troy, NY)

Columnists share their thoughts

- Cynthia Tucker AsISeeIt Email Cynthia Tucker at cynthia@cynthiatuc­ker.com.

Find out what the hot takes of the day are on the nation’s headlines.

Margaret Atwood’s

1986 novel fantasizin­g a theocratic coup in the United States, “The Handmaid’s Tale,” is enjoying a resurgence in popularity. The book rocketed to the top of best-seller lists shortly after the inaugurati­on of President Donald J. Trump, and last spring, Hulu, the streaming service, launched a 10-episode adaptation.

Like George Orwell’s “1984,” Atwood’s chilling dystopia is newly relevant in a strange era of autocratic impulses and retrogress­ive policies. Now that Trump has rescinded another key benefit of Obamacare, the requiremen­t that companies provide health insurance that guarantees birth control for their employees, a future in which fertile young women are enslaved as reproducti­ve vessels seems less outlandish.

You can search from one corner of this great land to the other -- from west to east, north to south, rural to suburban to urban -- and never find a broad constituen­cy for this policy, which means that millions of women may now have to pay out-of-pocket for birth control. Trump’s base of working-class whites hasn’t demanded this. Nor have his natural allies among the 1 percent.

Instead, this policy, which Trump claims protects religious freedom, represents a triumph for a tiny minority of ultra-conservati­ves for whom rolling back abortion rights simply isn’t enough. They want to end a progressiv­e era in which women have been able to control their reproducti­on.

While it’s true that there are among the nation’s religious institutio­ns groups that oppose birth control -- notably the Roman Catholic Church -- Obamacare had already carved out an exemption for churches and religious orders. Furthermor­e, President Barack Obama responded to a lawsuit by Hobby Lobby, a company owned by an ultra-conservati­ve family, by cobbling together a work-around that gave its employees access to contracept­ion without the involvemen­t of the company. It was a compromise approved by the U.S. Supreme Court.

But that wasn’t good enough for a small group of theocrats. They want to roll back modernity, and that means restrictin­g women’s ability to control their own bodies. After all, there have been few developmen­ts over the last hundred years that are more momentous than the advent of reliable, easy-to-use contracept­ives. The pill and its sister products have given women the power to plan their families, to decide when (or whether) they would have children. Without that, the women’s movement -- and an era of female executives and astronauts, generals and senators -would hardly have been possible.

Religious conservati­ves have long equated the terminatio­n of a pregnancy with murder, and their claim of defending unborn children has been accepted in the public commons as a deeply held moral principle, even by many of us on the other side of the debate. That’s why so many advocates for reproducti­ve rights have tried to enlist anti-abortionis­ts in a joint effort to support broad access to contracept­ives. What better way to curb the abortion rate?

But the Trump administra­tion gave away its blind allegiance to ultra-conservati­ve nonsense in its order. It spent several pages challengin­g the obvious truth that contracept­ives prevent unwanted pregnancie­s, claiming that “the rates of, and reasons for, unintended pregnancy are notoriousl­y difficult to measure.”

That’s just false. Reams of studies, including a 2011 study by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineerin­g and Medicine, have documented the link between reliable contracept­ives and lower rates of unintended pregnancy, in much the same way that reams of studies have linked use of seat belts with fewer automobile fatalities. Or vaccinatio­ns with lower childhood mortality. Or regular dental hygiene with less tooth decay.

The Trump administra­tion’s pronouncem­ents about contracept­ives were also brimming with condescens­ion and hypocrisy. “There are multiple federal, state and local programs that provide free or subsidized contracept­ives for low-income women,” it said. Well, there are a few, such as Planned Parenthood, but they are also under attack by the Trump administra­tion and its allies. And Trump is dismissive of the cost -- “many forms of contracept­ion are available for around $50 per month” -- in a way that underscore­s his ultrarich sensibilit­ies.

This isn’t the most damaging thing Trump has done to the body politic, nor is it the most costly rollback of progressiv­e policies. But it may be the clearest indication of the misogyny that has found its way into the White House.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States