The Record (Troy, NY)

Trump task force recommends ways to boost Postal Service

- By Martin Crutsinger AP Economics Writer

WASHINGTON>> A task force created by President Donald Trump to evaluate ways to stem billions of dollars in losses at the U.S. Postal Service suggested a range of options Tuesday, including proposals that could significan­tly boost the cost of sending non-essential mail.

The report recommende­d that the Postal Service develop a new pricing model that would remove current price caps and charge market-based prices for mail and packages that were not deemed to be “essential postal services.”

That recommenda­tion could raise costs for Amazon and other major businesses that are currently using the Postal Service to supplement their delivery operations.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said the report “contains achievable recommenda­tions.”

“The USPS is on an unsustaina­ble financial path which poses significan­t financial risk to American taxpayers,” Mnuchin said in a statement.

He said the task force review ordered by Trump last April had produced recommenda­tions that would “fulfill the president’s goal of placing the USPS on a path to sustainabi­lity.”

The president ordered creation of the task force, which was overseen by Mnuchin, last April after complainin­g that the Postal Service was not charging big users like Amazon enough to handle its ship- ments.

“Only fools, or worse, are saying that our money losing Post Office makes money with Amazon,” Trump tweeted in April.

Since taking office, Trump has often criticized Amazon and the head of the company, Jeff Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post.

The report found that the Postal Service is not correctly assessing the costs it incurs in delivering packages for companies like Amazon, but it did not make a finding that it was losing money in its dealings with Amazon.

Online retailers Amazon and eBay participat­ed in the report, according to the task force. In a statement, eBay said it is a “long standing partner of the United States Postal Service” and its “small business sellers rely on USPS to reach their customers.” Amazon did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment.

Postmaster General Megan Brennan said in a statement that the focus needs to be on achieving the legislativ­e and regulatory reforms that are urgently needed to reduce costs and allow the Postal Service to “function with greater flexibilit­y to adapt to a dynamic marketplac­e.”

Mark Dimondstei­n, president of the American Postal Workers Union, charged that many of the recommenda­tions in the report were based on “myth and misinforma­tion” and that instead of improving mail services “would deliver higher prices and less service to the public.”

In regard to charging more for non-essential postal services, officials who briefed reporters said person-to-person mail and person-to-person packages would be considered essential postal services and would be exempt from the higher rates that would be levied on non-essential mail.

Another recommenda­tion would be to clearly define the Postal Service’s “Universal Service Obligation­s,” which would spell out the types of mail and packages for which a strong rationale existed for government support of deliveries.

The report said that between 2007 and 2018, the Postal Service had experience­d net losses totaling $69 billion, with the Postal Service expected to lose tens of billions of dollars over the next decade.

“The USPS’s business model — including its governance, product pricing, cost allocation and labor practices — must be updated in light of its current operating realities,” the report said.

Last month, the Postal Service reported a financial loss for the 12th straight year, citing declines in mail volume and the costs of its pension and health care obligation­s.

Brennan said then that Congress needed to give the Postal Service more flexibilit­y to increase prices so it can return to profitabil­ity.

“The f lawed business model imposed by law continues to be the root cause of our financial instabilit­y,” Brennan said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States