The Record (Troy, NY)

Only the Dems can save this president

- George Will’s email address is georgewill@washpost.com.

Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral.

He was my friend, faithful and just to me:

But Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honorable man.

— From Shakespear­e’s

“Julius Caesar” Hakeem Jeffries has, it is whispered, ambitions. The 48-year-old congressma­n now in his fourth term representi­ng portions of Brooklyn and Queens, has been elected chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, the party’s fifth-most-important leadership position, and when, however many years hence, Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) steps down, if Democrats control the House, Jeffries might become the first African American speaker.

Personal political ambitions are as ubiquitous as they are necessary to produce noble public careers. Long after the assassinat­ion of his former law partner, William Herndon wrote that Abraham Lincoln’s “ambition was a little engine that knew no rest.”

Aren’t we glad that was so. Jeffries, however, also has a rarer and more needed ambition. It is the Madisonian ambition for his institutio­n’s dignity, strength and preeminenc­e.

For the separation of powers to function properly, producing constituti­onal equilibriu­m, there must be rivalry between the legislativ­e and executive branches. As James Madison said, “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.

The interest of the man must be connected with the constituti­onal rights of the place.” Or, today, the interest of the woman.

Greg Weiner, author of the best book about Madison’s thought (“Madison’s Metronome”), rightly celebrates the way the 35-day government shutdown ended: The House “stared down the presidency and won.” In losing, Donald Trump behaved (reluctantl­y) as a president should, as “a constituti­onal actor subservien­t in policymaki­ng matters to the will of Congress.” Pelosi “acted like a speaker of the House laying a claim to primacy in policymaki­ng.” Says Weiner, “This was institutio­nal hardball between branches not just with respect to policy but, more important, with respect to authority. Madisonian­s should rejoice.”

During his 1962 State of the Union address, President John F. Kennedy told his congressio­nal audience, “The Constituti­on makes us not rivals for power, but partners for progress.” Such anesthetiz­ing bromides serve the interests of presidents by diverting Congress from a truth expressed by the American Enterprise Institute’s Jay Cost: Congress is not, as its members too often and too plaintivel­y insist, a “coequal branch.” It is superior. It creates all executive-branch offices other than president and vice president, and all Article III courts other than the Supreme Court, and can deny appointmen­ts to the executive and judicial branches, whereas “the other branches are largely incapable of interferin­g with Congress.” The executive power enforces the law, the judicial power resolves controvers­ies under the law. The legislativ­e power makes the law: “It comes first.”

Jeffries understand­s intrabranc­h rivalry: Much that this Democratic-controlled House will send to the Republican-controlled Senate will be euthanized there. But the Democratic Party will thereby define itself and its opponent regarding such matters as curbing health-care costs, particular­ly (this was the most surprising­ly salient issue of the 2018 elections) the cost of prescripti­on drugs, by using the government’s bulk-purchasing power. Furthermor­e, having participat­ed in last year’s bipartisan criminal-justice reform, Jeffries thinks a big bipartisan infrastruc­ture measure is possible.

His district is five miles from that of Rep. Alexandria OcasioCort­ez, the left’s enfant terrible du jour, who provides sophomores of all ages with daily frissons from socialist daring (“We [millennial­s] never experience­d, really, a time of true economic prosperity in the United States”; zero carbon emissions in 12 years). For her, politics is performanc­e art; for Jeffries, it is a continuati­on of his life of adult seriousnes­s.

After New York University Law School, Jeffries spent seven years at a premier law firm (Paul, Weiss), then was at Viacom and CBS, then spent six years in New York’s state legislatur­e. Last week, while he was enjoying an almost abstemious breakfast (yogurt and cereal with berries, but also bacon), the morning paper was reporting Sen. Kamala D. Harris’s (D-Calif.) intriguing plan to win the presidency while promising to take away 177 million Americans’ private health insurance. That morning’s paper also reported that 56 percent of Americans — including majorities of women, Hispanics, blacks, urban residents, suburban residents, those under 65, college-educated whites — say they will “definitely not” vote to reelect the incumbent president.

Only Democrats can save this president. They can do so by nominating someone loopy enough to panic voters who are asking only for someone cheerful, intelligen­t and tethered to reality. Trump’s hope is that Jeffries-style Democrats — those with a Madisonian preference for a presidency proportion­al to its proper role, which is secondary to that of the First Branch — do not prevail within their party.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? George Will Columnist
George Will Columnist

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States