The Record (Troy, NY)

Columnists share their thoughts

- Dana Milbank Columnist Follow Dana Milbank on Twitter, @Milbank.

Find out what people have to say about local and national issues.

In the end, the darkest truth of Donald Trump’s crime came to light.

As his marauders sacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 in their bloody attempt to overturn the election, House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy called the then-president and pleaded for Trump to call off the attack.

Trump refused, essentiall­y telling McCarthy he got what he deserved. Trump was, in effect, content to let members of Congress die.

That damning account, in a statement Friday night from Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (Wash.), a Republican who defended Trump during his first impeachmen­t, momentaril­y threw the Senate’s impeachmen­t trial into chaos on its final day.

Trump’s lawyers, in their slashing, largely fictitious defense, claimed that Trump was “horrified” by the violence, hadn’t known that Vice President Mike Pence was in danger and took “immediate steps” to counter the rioting.

But Herrera Beutler revealed such claims to be a lie. When McCarthy “finally reached the president on January 6 and asked him to publicly and forcefully call off the riot, the president initially repeated the falsehood that it was antifa that had breached the Capitol,” she wrote. McCarthy, she continued, “refuted that and told the president that these were Trump supporters.

That’s when, according to McCarthy, the president said: ‘Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are.’ “

Her account wasn’t seriously or substantiv­ely refuted. On Saturday afternoon, senators agreed that Herrera Beutler’s statement would be entered into the trial record as evidence.

Even knowing this, most Republican senators, as long expected, voted to acquit Trump, a craven surrender to the political imperative not to cross the demagogue. But the impeachmen­t trial was not in vain, for it revealed the ugly truth: Trump knew lawmakers’ lives were in danger from his violent supporters, and instead of helping the people’s representa­tives escape harm, Trump scoffed.

Republican­s scrambled to limit the damage of Herrera Beutler’s revelation. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who had feigned being open to conviction, abandoned the pretense and, minutes before the Senate convened Saturday, emailed his Republican colleagues that he would vote to acquit.

On the Senate floor, Trump counsel Michael van der Veen, a personal-injury lawyer by day, tried in every way to demonstrat­e his indignatio­n at the late revelation. He shouted. He growled. He gesticulat­ed madly. He pounded the lectern. He stomped. He spit out words: “Antics.” “Rumor.” “Report.” “Innuendo.” “False narrative!” He actually declared that “it doesn’t matter what happened after the insurgence into the Capitol building.”

So what if Trump scoffed at McCarthy’s desperate entreaty to save lawmakers’ lives?

Sputtering like the Looney Tunes character Sylvester the Cat, van der Veen declared: “Nancy Pelosi’s deposition needs to be taken. Vice President Harris’s deposition absolutely needs to be taken. And not by Zoom. None of these deposition­s should be done by Zoom. We didn’t do this hearing by Zoom! These deposition­s should be done - in person, in my office, in Philly-delphia!” Sufferin’ succotash!

Laughter broke out in the chamber. “I don’t know why you’re laughing,” he responded. “It is civil process . . . . I’ll slap subpoenas on a good number of people.” He seemed to think he was arguing a slip-and-fall case in the Pennsylvan­ia Court of Common Pleas.

Republican­s joined the theatrics.

On the Senate floor, Sen. Ron Johnson (Wis.), an always-Trumper, was seen pointing at Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) and saying “blame you” in a raised voice. Romney was one of five Republican­s who joined all 50 Democrats in voting to allow witness testimony.

Sen. Mike Lee (Utah), another Trump ally, interrupte­d a presentati­on to complain that the House impeachmen­t managers “said something that’s not true” - never mind that the Senate had sat in silence during hours of falsehoods from Trump’s team.

After Herrera Beutler’s revelation­s sparked a vote for witnesses, Senate leaders brokered a compromise to keep the impeachmen­t trial from spiraling into endless discovery. Herrera Beutler’s statement would be admitted as evidence, but this would “not constitute a concession by either party as for the truth of the matters asserted by the other party.”

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the lead impeachmen­t manager, claimed that “this uncontradi­cted statement” provided “further decisive evidence of [Trump’s] intent to incite the insurrecti­on.”

Van der Veen, in response, howled about due process and fairness being “violently breached” - interestin­g words, given what his client did.

When the yeas and nays were counted, seven Senate Republican­s joined Herrera Beutler in her courageous stand, voting along with all 50 Democrats to convict Trump. The other 43 Republican­s, some of whom, like McConnell, feebly denounced Trump’s conduct even as they acquitted him, now have the cowardly distinctio­n of licking the boots of the man who left them to die.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States