The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Pesci: The Blumenthal­Carter Debate

- Don Pesci Don Pesci is a writer who lives in Vernon. E-mail him at donpesci@att.net.

In Carter, who is challengin­g Blumenthal, the State Republican Party may have found its “happy warrior.”

In Dan Carter, who is challengin­g Dick Blumenthal for a seat in the U.S. Senate, the State Republican Party may have found its “happy warrior,” a title the Democratic Party once bestowed on Hubert Humphrey.

Looks and presence in politics are not everything, but they are not nothing. U.S. Sen. Dick Blumenthal, whether he is debating or attending a garage sale, manages to look like the Old Man of the Mountain before the slide. Stiff, foreboding, resolute, unbudgeabl­e – most especially on the matter of partial birth abortion, parental notificati­on and the selling of baby parts, all issues that place him very far from his Connecticu­t constituen­ts. And he is preachy, the very image of a Harvard-Yale educated aggressive Attorney General on the hunt for delinquent business owners, though abortion in its grosser forms is the one profitable business in the United States that Blumenthal adamantly refuses to regulate.

Perhaps the best line in the recent debate between the two on WFSB Face the State was delivered by Mr. Carter following a windy discourse by Mr. Blumenthal explaining how a solicitous government produces jobs. Mr. Blumenthal thinks it is proper for Washington Beltway politician­s to take a dollar from successful company A and give it to company B, which invariably is less successful: Why else would company B be soliciting tax money from crony capitalist politician­s in Washington? Mr. Carter thinks it is the role of the U.S. Congress to promulgate general and equitable laws that spur business activity, which in turn increases federal tax revenue, c.f. President John Kennedy’s address to the Economics Club of New York in 1962.

After Mr. Blumenthal had finished describing his Rube Goldberg economic policy, which does exactly the opposite of what he would wish, the “happy warrior” smilingly observed that he was having “a Deja vu moment,” a reference to Mr. Blumenthal’s forgettabl­e answer to a question put to him in an earlier debate by billionair­e Republican challenger Linda McMahon: “How is wealth created?”

“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool,” said Abe Lincoln “than to speak and to remove all doubt,” good advice now twice spurned by Mr. Blumenthal.

Connecticu­t is suffering a chronic economic downturn largely because Democrats who have pledged their troth to employees unions, much in the way Blumenthal has married himself to the baby parts merchants, simply do not know that business best flourishes when the withering hand of government – high taxes and unnecessar­y regulation­s – only lightly and equitably touches it. Not for nothing did George Washington say “Government is force,” which is and should be restrained by the U.S. Constituti­on and the Bill of Rights.

Obamacare, now failing, is for all practical purposes an alternativ­e insurance company; it’s failure will almost certainly drive authoritar­ian Democrats to “fix” the wreck by transferri­ng to a universal healthcare system – Democrat Presidenti­al candidate Hillary Clinton has hinted as much -- at which point already reeling Connecticu­t insurance companies will find themselves in competitio­n with a national insurance company far removed from a competitiv­e marketplac­e and supported through tax dollars. Connecticu­t is heavily invested in its insurance companies, and there is little doubt that a national “investment” in a government driven universal health care system will transform many of Connecticu­t’s insurance companies into boutique insurance providers. As a necessary consequenc­e, jobs will be lost, tax revenue will diminish, and Connecticu­t’s crony capitalist Governor Dannel Malloy will find it even less possible to bribe Connecticu­t insurance companies to continue to provide employment in a market that has been so substantia­lly transforme­d.

Following the Blumenthal Carter debate, one paper reported that there were “notable areas of philosophi­cal disagreeme­nt” between the two candidates. Philosophi­cal indeed! One does not spur job creation in a private marketplac­e by taking from the marketplac­e dollars used to create business activity and jobs, then distributi­ng those dollars to projects that never will be self-sustaining.

Connecticu­t itself is flush with jobs created by government; the public employee marketplac­e has exploded. But every dollar used to pay for salaries and underfunde­d benefits that are 25 to 46 percent more costly than those provided in the private marketplac­e, according to the unimpeacha­ble Yankee Institute, is a dollar lost that otherwise might have been used to create jobs now purchased with bribes in the form of grants and temporary tax cuts offered to ailing Connecticu­t companies. And why, pray tell, are companies in Connecticu­t ailing – or worse, moving out of state?

We know why. The great rush from Connecticu­t has little to do with philosophy and everything to do with a government wearing ideologica­l blinders that prevent it from drawing logical obvious conclusion­s from events politician­s would prefer to ignore – in order to win elections so that the reigning power might continue to execute failed policies.

Blumenthal, the 11th richest legislator in the U.S. Congress and as imperishab­le as the Old Man of the Mountain before the slide, will not allow more debates between himself and “The Happy Warrior” because it is not in his interest to do so. Absent a great awakening among Connecticu­t’s voters, Blumenthal at least has a good chance of retaining his job.

 ?? NEW HAVEN REGISTER FILE PHOTO ?? U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal
NEW HAVEN REGISTER FILE PHOTO U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States