The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)
State Sen. Suzio says rapists, violent criminals should not be released early
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics” – a remark attributed by Mark Twain to Disraeli
State Sen. Len Suzio lost his seat to Dante Bartolomeo in a hardfought contest in 2014 by 1 percent of the vote and won the seat back in 2016 by 2.8 percent of the vote.
His is a particularly difficult seat for Republicans; registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans in the 13th District roughly by a two-to-one margin. Think of Sisyphus rolling his stone up a perilously steep incline.
Suzio, energetic and persistent, is now back in a state Senate evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans, for which Republicans must thank the failing progressive policies of Gov. Dannel Malloy.
“Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence,” said Calvin Coolidge, no stranger to persistence himself. “Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent.”
Owing to a murder a few streets from where he lived in Meriden, Suzio was early awakened to the glaring faults in a new prison program inaugurated by Under Secretary for Criminal Justice Policy and Planning Mike Lawlor who, along with Malloy, has taken credit for a drop in crime rates prevalent in most states in the union.
In speaking about his own prison reforms, the most prominent of which is an ill-conceived Risk Reduction Earned Credit Program, Mr. Lawlor, the former co-chair of the state’s Judiciary Committee, simply suggests a connection between his get-out-of-jailearly program and plunging crime rates, the inference being that the drop in crime has been caused by Mr. Lawlor’s brilliant program. In fact, the drop in crime rates may more plausibly be attributed to the prevalence of video cameras and advances in DNA testing, which makes successful prosecutions more certain.
The drop in crime rates has been attributed to other various causes: higher incarceration rates, increased hiring of police officers, a crime statistic tracking tool, Comstat, that has improved police response and, intriguingly, according to a study by economist Steven Levitt, “the city’s higher rate of abortion… In the original paper outlining the theory, Levitt and fellow economist John Donohoe argued the 1973 [Roe v Wade] ruling reduced the number of children born in unwanted circumstances, thereby reducing the number of children predisposed to violent crime later in life. Overall, they estimated this 20-year lag effect might account for as much as half of the crime decline in the ’90s.”
Some of the data showing a drop in crime may be attributed to decriminalization: If possession of small amounts of drugs for personal use is decriminalized, imprisonments, crimes rates and recidivism rates will be reduced. If a drug user cannot be arrested because his crime has been redefined so as to spare him prison time, his recidivism rate will be reduced to zero, even though he persists in committing his former now non-prosecutable crimes. The same principle applies in sanctuary cities in which police have been ordered to overlook federal detainers.
Suzio and other wideawake Republicans noticed almost immediately that the credits distributed by Lawlor could hardly have been “earned” by those prisoners who received them retrospectively, and the blood spilled so close to Suzio’s own house by Frankie “The Razor” Resto, a beneficiary of the program, strongly suggested that “risk” had not been reduced for the shopkeeper Resto murdered soon after his release. Resto demanded cash from Ibraham Ghazal and, after it had been given to him, shot his victim in the chest, murdering him with an assault weapon he most certainly did not purchase at a gun show.
Suzio has persisted in demanding real data on the recidivism rates of prisoners who take advantage (pun intended) of Lawlor’s get-out-of-jail-early program. Having asked for the needle in the data haystack, Lawlor has supplied him with a barn full of data hay bales. He had not reckoned on Suzio’s persistence. Having sorted through the data dump, Suzio has now written a bill that prevents the assigning of credits to anyone convicted of “a violent crime or sexual offense,” a modest and necessary reform.
“Violent felons are getting out of prison early, and they are committing murders, rapes, and other horrible crimes. They are not being reformed,” Suzio says, “and we have the statistics to prove it. It’s a revolving door.’’