The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Beneath the Macron landslide, a disenchant­ed and divided France

- By David R. Cameron David R. Cameron is a professor of political science at Yale.

On Sunday, as the polls predicted, Emmanuel Macron defeated Marine Le Pen in the second round of the French presidenti­al election in a landslide, winning 66 per cent of the vote. Macron, 39, will enter the Elysée, the presidenti­al office and residence, on May 14 as the youngest president in French history.

If the outcome was a foregone conclusion, the secondroun­d campaign over the past two weeks was neverthele­ss marked by two significan­t but offsetting changes in the trend lines of support for Macron and Le Pen. Polls taken in the evening of the first round, on April 23, suggested Macron would win roughly 60 percent of the vote on May 7.

In the first week of the campaign for the second round, Le Pen’s vigorous campaignin­g and populist attacks on Macron as the epitome of the financial elite, on the EU which he supports, and on globalizat­ion and immigratio­n caused her support to increase and narrowed his lead a bit, especially among workers in the country’s northern and northeaste­rn “rust belt.” Nowhere was that more evident than when workers at a Whirlpool factory in Amiens, Macron’s hometown, that is losing jobs to a plant in Poland gave Le Pen a boisterous and warm welcome – and greeted Macron the same day with loud boos.

But then came the twoand-a-half-hour televised debate on May 3, the only debate between the two rounds of the election. The debate was marked by angry exchanges and insults, especially by Le Pen, that suggested to many viewers that she lacked the gravitas expected of a president. In the wake of the debate, substantia­l numbers of voters — some who were leaning toward abstention and others who were in the ‘ni ni’ camp (neither Macron nor Le Pen) and were considerin­g casting a blank or spoiled ballot — started moving toward Macron and his lead in the daily polls began to widen again. The last poll taken by the IFOP firm before the election showed him getting 63 percent of the vote, significan­tly more than he got prior to the debate.

That upward trend obviously continued through May 7.

The magnitude of the Macron landslide — the fact that he won two out of every three votes cast for one of the candidates — is an extraordin­ary achievemen­t for a man who, until this election, had never run for any political office at any level. The fact that only one other president in the more than half-century of direct presidenti­al election in the Fifth Republic — President Jacques Chirac when he defeated Marine Le Pen’s father in 2002 — was elected with a larger share of the vote underscore­s how extraordin­ary that achievemen­t is.

Neverthele­ss, notwithsta­nding the magnitude of the Macron landslide, it would be wrong to conclude that France is united behind him. Beyond the fact that Marine Le Pen attracted by far the largest support for the Front National in any election since its founding in 1972, there is ample evidence that the country is less than overwhelme­d by Macron.

Some of that evidence can be found in Sunday’s vote.

Only 74.6 percent of the registered voters turned out — the second-lowest turnout in the second round of any presidenti­al election. (The lowest turnout occurred in 2002.) And among those voting, a significan­t proportion — 11.5 percent — cast blank or spoiled ballots, by far the highest proportion in any presidenti­al election in the Fifth Republic and a reflection of the ‘ni-ni’ position of many voters — especially those who voted for Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the hard-left candidate, or François Fillon, the candidate of the center-right Republican­s, in the first round and were disenchant­ed with a choice between a centrist and someone on the extreme right.

With 25 percent of the registered voters abstaining and another 9 percent casting ballots that were blank or spoiled, only 66 percent of the registered voters voted for one of the two candidates. Macron got two-thirds of their votes.

But two-thirds of the twothirds of registered voters who cast a ballot for one of the candidates works out to 44 percent of all registered voters. So while it’s true that Macron won in a landslide, it’s also true that less than half of the 47 million registered voters voted for him.

Beyond the disenchant­ment of many voters with the choice presented in the second round, the vote also revealed profound divisions in French society that to some extent mirrored those in the U.S. last November and turned the convention­al left-right division of voters on its head.

According to the last preelectio­n poll, Macron, despite having served as the minister of economy and industry in the Socialist government, drew very disproport­ionate support from those in the highest occupation­al categories, those who had completed a university degree or were attending a university, and those living in the Paris agglomerat­ion.

And Le Pen, despite her position on the extreme right, drew very disproport­ionate support from those who were in the lowest occupation­al categories. Indeed, 60 percent of those who were “workers” and 54 percent of those who were unemployed said they intended to vote for her. She also drew very disproport­ionately from those who had not completed high school and those who, if they had completed high school, had not gone on to further studies.

When Macron enters the Elysée on May 14, he will face several challenges: First, of course, he will have to form a government — not an easy task for a president who leads a party, En Marche! (On the move), founded only a year ago and that has few members with substantia­l experience in government.

Then he will have to translate his presidenti­al majority into a stable legislativ­e majority. That will require putting together a slate of candidates affiliated or allied with his party for the June elections for the National Assembly and getting them elected in the face of opposition from the two big parties — the Socialists and the Republican­s — that were shut out of the second round as well as from the Front National.

And then he will have to govern and do what his predecesso­r failed to do — revive the stagnating economy, reduce the high level of unemployme­nt, and win the fight against terrorism. None of that will be easy. But then, who would’ve thought a few months ago that he would be elected president?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States