The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Republican­s didn’t assist Trump with Comey

- By Jonathan Bernstein

It was a riveting display of political fireworks, complete with a fired FBI director accusing his former boss of lying about why he was fired. James Comey also said he had to take special precaution­s with Trump in large part because the president can’t be trusted to tell the truth. Devastatin­g. But the core of James Comey’s testimony was built upon the question of obstructio­n of justice, for which he had a clear and, basically, unconteste­d story:

- President Donald Trump made clear over time he wanted Comey to be loyal to the president, not to the law or the Bureau, and that loyalty meant curtailing the Russia investigat­ion;

- The investigat­ion went forward unimpeded. Comey is in fact loyal to the law and the Bureau, not to the president; - Trump fired Comey; - And Trump himself said the dismissal was over the Russia investigat­ion.

Committee Republican­s may have had some success poking holes in the precise meaning of Trump’s requests to Comey: Was it limited to just the Flynn portion of the investigat­ion or something broader? But it’s Trump’s public statements on why he fired Comey that support the latter.

That this constitute­s a form of obstructio­n of justice and is therefore “impeachabl­e” is fairly obvious. But impeachabl­e is a funny word.

What is a justified and legitimate use of Congress’ impeachmen­t power? The Constituti­on doesn’t say. Nor does it require Congress to act just because “everybody” thinks that the president has done something impeachabl­e. That’s a political question completely up to the House to decide (and then for the Senate if the House puts it to them).

In that sense, while there’s no way of knowing how this scandal plays out, what we already know is devastatin­g to the president’s profession­al reputation. Republican­s as well as Democrats will conclude that the president is incompeten­t, that his word cannot be trusted, that he does not respect the laws and norms of the constituti­onal system, and that those around him either share each of those traits or act as if they shared them. Of course this episode and the broader Russia scandal are only one piece of that, but anyone tempted to believe that Trump’s bluster was limited to peripheral situations will certainly know that he acted unprofessi­onally and worse even with national security and his own political viability on the line.

We can see that in the questionin­g from committee Republican­s, which broke down into three groups.

- A couple just wanted to talk about Hillary Clinton and emails.

- A couple asked questions designed to draw Comey out further, questions the White House could not be happy about at all.

- And about half of them tried to challenge Comey’s facts and interpreta­tions, but most of them did so in only a halfhearte­d way, and none of them shook the former director’s story at all on any subject.

So while it’s quite true that no Republican “broke with” the president in the sense of adopting the harsh language that the Democrats used, it’s also true that none of them really did much to support the president; at best it seemed the president can count on some Republican­s to be reluctant but willing partisan warriors, but it sure didn’t seem to me that Trump had any real friends in that room.

The legal case against the Trump team and any potential impeachmen­t will depend on many factors, including other facts which we don’t yet know. But the damage to Trump is severe. A president who is not respected, trusted, or even feared is not going to have much influence in Washington. I’m not only talking about members of Congress. I’m also talking about bureaucrat­s, state government­s, even judges. If things don’t change, and it’s hard to see any reason to expect them too, we’re going to have years of a president, as Matt Glassman said, will be “reduced to almost the bare bones formal powers of the office.”

Comey and this hearing can be seen then not (necessaril­y) as steps on the way to some ultimate climax of the presidency, but as confirmati­on of how badly Trump is doing, and how little he’ll be able to get done going forward.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States