The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Make us part of the solution in Connecticu­t

- Signed, David Bechtel, Hamden; Courtney Bourns, West Hartford; Evan Cowles, Farmington; Franklin and Shannon Demarest, Higganum; Rachel Garron and Scott Schoem, MD, West Hartford; Tracy Hewat, Salisbury; Robert Nixon, Old Greenwich; Martha Peterson, Hamde

An open letter to Governor Malloy and the Connecticu­t legislatur­e:

We are upper-income Connecticu­t residents who treasure the quality of life in Connecticu­t and care deeply about the state’s future.

We are concerned about the projected $2.8 billion budget gap for the current fiscal year, and we are willing and able to pay more taxes as part of the solution to filling that gap going forward. Some combinatio­n of budget cuts and increased revenue must be found to balance Connecticu­t’s budget.

We believe that many of the ideas currently being considered would unnecessar­ily harm our most vulnerable citizens. While some budget cuts are necessary, we call for a balanced solution that includes an increase in taxes for those of us in the top 5 percent (with incomes of $250,000 and above), combined with targeted, responsibl­e cuts in spending. Raising the sales tax is a regressive approach to raising revenue, and affects lower-income households most.

Weakening the earned income tax credit, as some have proposed, puts additional strain on our lower-income families. Cuts to health care, child care and other services that disproport­ionately affect low-income children and families end up costing the state more in the long term. We cannot afford to, and morally should not, short-change these children who are our state’s future.

While revenues may be down, the state’s revenues tend to rise and fall with capital gains. It would be irresponsi­ble to cut important long-term investment­s in education, health, services, infrastruc­ture, job training, etc., due to a short-term revenue shortfall.

Those of us in the top 5 percent can afford to pay more. While many in our state are struggling economical­ly, those of us at the top have done quite well in the past decades. 84% of all income gains between 1979 to 2012 went to the top 1 percent , who now have the highest income of any state, alongside a greater share of income than in any other state.

Meanwhile, the top marginal tax rate in Connecticu­t sits at 6.99 percent , below neighborin­g New York State (8.82 percent ), and soon to be below Massachuse­tts’ likely 9.1 percent rate. Opponents of raising top tax rates point to highprofil­e cases of millionair­es leaving the state, purportedl­y due to the tax rate, but numerous studies have shown that upper-income migration due to taxes represents a very small fraction of moves, and is far outweighed by the increased revenue that would result from a tax increase.

The same proportion of upper-income households move from no-tax New Hampshire to Florida as move from Connecticu­t to Florida. We are not about to pack up and leave because we are asked to pay a bit more on our state taxes. Every .5 percent increase in tax rates on the top 5 percent of earners in Connecticu­t (incomes over $250,000) would bring in $217 million in additional revenue.

Raising the top two marginal rates (currently 6.9 percent and 6.99 percent ) by 2 percent in Connecticu­t would bring in an estimated $868 million per year, closing a significan­t portion of the $2.8 billion budget gap, and helping to avoid harmful budget cuts and revenue increases elsewhere that fall disproport­ionately on our needier citizens. We can afford to pay more and should. We are willing to be part of the solution.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States