The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Abraham Lincoln and the power of silence

- Lewis E. Lehrman, co-founder of the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History, is author of “Lincoln & Churchill: Statesmen at War (Stackpole, 2018) and “Lincoln at Peoria: The Turning Point” (Stackpole, 2008).

Known for their speaking abilities, Abraham Lincoln and Winston Churchill often knew when and why to be quiet. “Solomon says there is ‘a time to keep silence, ” President-elect Lincoln told the Indiana Legislatur­e in February 1861. “I am rather inclined to silence, and whether that be wise or not,” he told a Pittsburgh crowd a few days later. “It is at least more unusual nowadays to find a man who can hold his tongue than to find one who cannot.”

In the month before his inaugurati­on, Lincoln felt growing pressure to speak out about the Union and secession. When the president-elect arrived in New York City Feb. 19, he declared: “I have not kept silence since the presidenti­al election ... from any indifferen­ce to the anxiety that pervades the minds of men about the aspect of the political affairs of the country. I have kept silence for the reason that I supposed it was peculiarly proper that I should do so until the time came when, according to the custom of the country, I could speak officially.”

Silence came easier to Lincoln than to Churchill. In the winter of 1860 after Lincoln concluded a series of speeches at Cooper Union in New York and in cities around New England, he ceased making public pronouncem­ents for almost a year.

Raised in rural Kentucky and Indiana, Lincoln found solace, even as an adult, in quiet walks around town and in the country. In his Springfiel­d law office, he could become lost in his own thoughts while lying on the office couch. As president, Lincoln’s silences were even more striking. Historian William E. Gienapp wrote: “Slow and deliberate, Lincoln carefully thought through problems, weighing alternativ­es in his mind, before reaching a decision. (Secretary John G.) Nicolay reported that ‘he would sometimes sit for an hour in complete silence, his eyes almost shut,’ pondering some question.”

The silences of Prime Minister Churchill were less frequent. But, like Lincoln, Churchill needed time to think. Trusted bodyguard Walter H. Thompson wrote: “Churchill often acted impulsivel­y but it would be wrong to think he acted capricious­ly. On many occasions during the first two years of the war, often right after a film showing, he would come down to the Great Hall locked up in deep thought of his own, then go suddenly and alone to a small table and play bagatelle. He would work seriously at this anything but serious game, trying for the highest possible score, and jotting down each result on a piece of paper with religious bookkeepin­g exactness. Callers seeing such action for the first time went away thinking it an odd caprice, and no doubt reporting it as such. But it was not.”

“When he walked away quickly from large groups and did something alone with what very often appeared as spectacula­r and unnecessar­y brusquenes­s, it was to be alone with a problem until he could find his own answer to it,” continued Thompson. “He always came back with one and laid it out thoroughly for those involved. And they always expected it. What they did not know was where Winston had got it. He had got it, often, right there over the game of bagatelle, or upstairs in the cinema room, or marching with crazy relentless­ness up and down the Great Hall.”

Talking and writing was Churchill’s way of life. Churchill had begun his political career believing that he should be paid to talk. No sooner had he been elected to the House of Commons in 1900 than he began a lecture tour, first in England, then in the United States and Canada about his role in the Boer War. In July 1900, Churchill wrote his agent: “I don’t want to be dragged about to any social functions of any kind nor shall I think of talking about my experience­s to anybody except when I am paid for doing so.”

Churchill’s father died in debt so the 26-year-old knew he needed to make money to support himself; he was proud when his literary and speaking efforts cleared £10,000.

Lincoln experience­d life very differentl­y. Emancipate­d at 21 from his duty to work for his father, Lincoln would make his living as a self-taught lawyer giving free political speeches as he worked his way around the Eighth Judicial Circuit in Illinois. Indeed, when he finally charged $200 for a political speech — the Cooper Union address of February 1860 — it became something of a partisan scandal. Churchill would make a very good living as a writer and speaker. Lincoln tried and failed to as a paid lecturer in the late 1850s.

Lincoln and Churchill used their silences to compose their thoughts and to reflect. In August 1940, the prime minister was driving to Chequers after visiting the headquarte­rs of the No. 11 Group, Fighter Command, where that night he observed that every single British plane was engaged in fighting German attackers. “Don’t speak to me,” Churchill cautioned to a top military aide. “I have never been so moved.”

The prime minister broke the silence a few minutes later, saying: “Never in the field of human conflict has so much been owed by so many to so few.” Some days later, Churchill delivered a radio address and declared to the nation: “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many owed to so few.”

 ?? De Agostini/Getty Images ?? Portrait of Abraham Lincoln
De Agostini/Getty Images Portrait of Abraham Lincoln

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States