The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

More taxes are not the answer: Fiscal responsibi­lity is

- By Samantha Violante Samantha Violante is a West Haven resident.

I am writing in opposition the proposed tolls in Connecticu­t.

As an active voter and taxpayer, I am adamantly against any commuter tolls in Connecticu­t. These bills have been introduced to alleviate the state’s burden of not having enough money in the budget for road maintenanc­e. Given the state’s complete mismanagem­ent of funds in years past, how can we be sure that this money will be used for road maintenanc­e?

More importantl­y, we as residents simply cannot afford it. We have the highest gas tax in the country, which was presumably set to fund road maintenanc­e in Connecticu­t. Where has all of this money gone? It is estimated the average driver will spend $5 to $6 each day, one way, to travel between New Haven and NYC daily. A majority of people on this stretch of road are commuters and must travel to work into NYC. This will add an expense of more than $3,000 annually to already cash strapped residents and commuters.

As a proposed train fare increase is also in the works, taking the train as an option does not alleviate the financial stress (+$50/month New Haven — NYC). Not to mention this will also deter out-of-state residents to coming into Connecticu­t to visit our parks, beaches and casinos to generate additional revenue that we so badly need.

In fact, it seems every project designed to contribute to our roads has been mismanaged. Malloy’s nightmare of a project — Connecticu­t Railway — has spent $567 million in the last seven years, for a project that costs $17.5 million to operate and only brings in $4.2 millionfor a lower than projected number of riders. Malloy and the state Department of Transporta­tion also unveiled a 30-year, $100 billion “Let’s Go Ct” initiative, aimed at improving our roads and infrastruc­ture in 2015. The goal of which is “A comprehens­ive, long-term solution to fix the consequenc­es of deferred maintenanc­e of the transporta­tion infrastruc­ture”. Where has this money gone? In addition, states legislator­s are overlookin­g other viable options to bring in revenue such as the legalizati­on of recreation­al marijuana and to tax the related recreation­al sales. NY and NJ are both looking to legalize and MA will be legal by summer 2018. We will quickly become the only state surrounded by legal recreation­al use states.

Consequent­ly, we can watch that potential revenue fly out the window, into other state’s pockets — which could be upwards of $70 million in the first year alone. Connecticu­t already has the infrastruc­ture in place for medical marijuana. Recreation­al legalizati­on could potentiall­y add revenue to the DOT and to education, which is so badly needed.

With restrictio­ns (over 21, limits to purchase amount) legalizing recreation­al marijuana may be the only thing that can save this cash-strapped state and alleviate some of the public’s tax burden. And the majority of public support it.

We are tired of mismanaged funds at the state level. People are leaving Connecticu­t in droves simply because the cost of living is higher than most (fourth highest “move out” rate in the country). More taxes are not the answer. Fiscal responsibi­lity is the answer.

Elected officials are elected by we, the people, to represent what we want. The majority of Connecticu­t residents seem vehemently opposed to the tolls. So why are the elected officials, who supposedly act on our behalf, backing this? I implore elected officials to listen to your constituen­ts and please vote no on these bills.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States