The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Budget process threatened on two fronts

- By Lisa Gilbert Courtesy of InsideSour­ces.com.

Right now, the annual federal budgeting process faces threats on two fronts, both of which could sabotage Congress’ ability to reach spending deals that keep our government open and functionin­g.

Appropriat­ions subcommitt­ees in the House of Representa­tives have begun marking up spending bills for fiscal year 2019 and moving them out of committee. One perennial threat to the budget process is that appropriat­ors may try to add dozens of partisan poison pill riders — special favors for big corporatio­ns and ideologica­l extremists that have nothing to do with funding our government — into these spending bills.

In recent years, poison pill riders added early in the process have targeted protection­s for women’s health, our environmen­t, our nation’s campaign finance system, Wall Street protection­s and more. Lawmakers must remain vigilant and oppose the inclusion of these harmful measures.

It’s bad enough that Congress has to contend with poison pill riders that could sabotage the next spending agreement, but Congress also is facing a threat from the White House that would unravel previous ones.

White House Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney recently proposed a set of rescission­s on behalf of President Trump. These rollbacks of already allocated funding for key programs and policies would take back up to $15 billion from previously approved spending arrangemen­ts, almost half of which comes out of rainy day funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

The irony that this announceme­nt happened at the same time as first lady Melania Trump’s speech establishi­ng her main cause as helping children is lost on no one.

The two-year budget deal, reached in March after more than a year of negotiatio­ns, was premised in part upon not needing to replenish CHIP funding. What this means is that Trump’s proposed rescission­s clawing back CHIP funding hack away at the foundation­s of that deal — even if, so far, they haven’t directly touched the deal’s spending levels.

By rehashing old funding fights, Trump risks delaying the 2019 budget and underminin­g Congress’ ability to reach bipartisan budget agreements. It also shows Trump’s true colors as a deal breaker, not a deal maker.

Bipartisan deal making requires that both parties keep their word. Congress won’t be able to pass future budget deals that keep our government open and our country running if one side can just backtrack on their agreements.

Both ideologica­l riders and budget rescission­s are extreme, controvers­ial, partisan and poisonous to budget negotiatio­ns. Another similarity is that they represent a breach of regular order in the budget process.

Republican politician­s keep promising regular order, but their continued insistence on inappropri­ate partisan riders — and now Trump’s focus on rescission­s — shows they are still having trouble getting their house in order.

We’ll need a new appropriat­ions package at the end of September. That means Congress has less than five months to come to an agreement, so there isn’t a moment to waste.

Trump and Republican appropriat­ors should stop playing political games and instead focus on reaching a bipartisan spending deal free from poison pill riders — so the country avoids another pointless and costly government shutdown this fall.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States