The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

A constructi­on boom built on myths

- Jim Cameron

How did Americans develop their love affair with driving?

Visit the Smithsonia­n’s National Museum of American History in Washington and the transporta­tion exhibit “America on the Move” will sell you on the commonly held theory that when Henry Ford made cars affordable, Americans loved them and demanded more and more highways.

Of course, that exhibit is sponsored by General Motors, which donated millions to put its name on the collection.

But University of Virginia history professor Peter Norton, author of “Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in American cities” contends that’s a myth. Just as outgoing

President Dwight Eisenhower warned us of the military industrial complex, Norton says an automotive-constructi­on complex took over our country, paving from coast to coast.

Sure, Americans like their cars. But it was a conspiracy of economic interests that turned us into a car culture. Where cities once enjoyed a network of cheap, fast streetcars, GM, Firestone and oil companies bought and wiped them out, replacing them with buses and cars.

“This country destroyed and rebuilt its cities in the 20th century to serve automobile­s,” Norton says.

And those same interest groups are alive and well in Connecticu­t.

Groups like “Move CT Forward” aren’t pro-transporta­tion as much as they are pro jobs — in constructi­on. The groups have spent a lot of money lobbying in Hartford to keep their members, the unions and contractor­s busy. While I’m happy they’re promoting transporta­tion, their motives are

hardly altruistic.

This is nothing new, Norton says. The original interstate highways built in the 1950s used Portland Cement because that company lobbied so hard for its product over cheaper asphalt. Now that rusting rebar and crumbling cement is costing us a fortune.

Another myth from that era was that Eisenhower built the interstate­s to move troops quickly for national defense. That may have been the pitch to Congress, but the real reason for the highways was to evacuate civilians from the big cities in the event of nuclear war. Luckily, we never had to test that idea.

When Hurricane Harvey hit Houston — the most urbanized highway city in the country —authoritie­s last summer didn’t even try to evacuate people because they knew more would die on congested roads than in the storm.

Who pays for all this road building? You do, in the form of income taxes and, yes, gasoline taxes. But Norton says gas taxes are hardly a fair way to pay for everything.

Why does the motorist driving on a dirt road pay the same gas tax as one driving Interstate 95? The costs they place on road maintenanc­e, the environmen­t and our stress levels are grossly different, so why isn’t the cost?

“It would be like having Best Buy selling everything by the pound. People would flock to the electronic­s

Driving may seem to be free, but it isn’t. Until we ask drivers to pay for its real cost, there is no incentive to do anything but drive (and pave) more.

(our crowded interstate­s) instead of the towels,” he notes. I’m not sure Best Buy even sells towels, but I take his point.

He reminds us that before the interstate­s, the nation’s first “super highways” like the Pennsylvan­ia and New Jersey turnpikes were built as toll roads — not freeways — and remain that way today.

Driving may seem to be free, but it isn’t. Until we ask drivers to pay for its real cost, there is no incentive to do anything but drive (and pave) more.

 ??  ??
 ?? Tyler Sizemore / Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? Workers repair a portion of a damaged Interstate 95 bridge in Stamford. The growing number of cars on the highways has taken its toll on infrastruc­ture.
Tyler Sizemore / Hearst Connecticu­t Media Workers repair a portion of a damaged Interstate 95 bridge in Stamford. The growing number of cars on the highways has taken its toll on infrastruc­ture.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States