The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Two cheers for Trump’s declassifi­cation order

- By Thomas L. Knapp Thomas L. Knapp is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertaria­n Advocacy Journalism.

On September 17, Politico reports, U.S. president Donald Trump partially declassifi­ed a government surveillan­ce applicatio­n targeting former campaign consultant Carter Page and directed the U.S. Department of Justice to publicly release text messages relating to the “Russiagate” probe between former FBI Director James Comey and other DoJ/FBI personnel.

Whether or not this is a smart on Trump’s part remains to be seen, but in my opinion it’s the right move. I’m giving it two cheers, not three, only because I’d like to see more stuff declassifi­ed and publicly released.

Americans stand divided on the question of whether or not the Russian state “meddled” in the 2016 US presidenti­al election. We’re also divided on the question of whether or not Trump and/or key associates of Trump, “colluded” in such meddling.

So far, the actual publicly produced evidence makes a very limited case for the “meddling” charge (a Russian troll farm apparently ran some cheesy Facebook ads, etc. and the whole operation doesn’t seem to have cost a drop in the bucket compared to e.g. Sheldon Adelson’s $125 million “meddling” on behalf of Israel), and no case at all for the “collusion” allegation­s that wouldn’t apply equally to Trump’s opponents (who paid a British former spy to work Russian sources for “dirt” on Trump).

At this point, “Russiagate” continues to look like a ham-handed attempt to explain away Hillary Clinton’s poorly run — and losing — 2016 presidenti­al campaign, because nothing that happens to Hillary Clinton can ever be even a little bit Hillary Clinton’s fault.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller has had 16 months to get the goods on “Russian meddling” and “collusion.” So far, he’s publicly produced bubkes beyond indicting some Russians who will never face trial (or, convenient­ly for Mueller, testify) and some charges (including a few with plea bargains or conviction­s) against Trump associates on pretty much everything under the sun except his actual brief.

The closest he’s come is with former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, who’s admitted to lying to the FBI about post-election, not pre-election, contacts with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak — contacts concerning the United Nations and (there’s that other country again) Israel.

Classifica­tion of informatio­n by the U.S. government is structured per Executive Order 13526, which mandates that:

“In no case shall informatio­n be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassifi­ed in order to ... conceal violations of law, inefficien­cy, or administra­tive error ... prevent embarrassm­ent to a person, organizati­on, or agency ... [or] prevent or delay the release of informatio­n that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.”

The allegation­s are already out there. The only plausible reasons for keeping the evidence for (or against) them classified are the reasons expressly prohibited in that executive order.

President Trump, get all the informatio­n out in public.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States