The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Connecticu­t urban schools face unique challenges

- Sal Pascarella, Superinten­dent of Danbury Public Schools, and Mark Benigni, Superinten­dent of Meriden Public Schools, are Co-Chairmen of the Connecticu­t Associatio­n of Urban Superinten­dents. This opinion was first published in CTMirror.org.

The Connecticu­t Associatio­n of Urban Superinten­dents is a coalition of public school superinten­dents from the state’s neediest districts. While we represent only 20 communitie­s, we educate nearly half of the state’s population of students.

Our districts are responsibl­e for educating Connecticu­t’s most diverse communitie­s. We educate larger numbers of students in poverty than other districts in the state. We often have higher percentage­s of special needs students — our kids deal not only with the challenges of educationa­l attainment, but also must deal with issues like hunger, homelessne­ss, trauma, and more. Educating these population­s of kids takes more resources and specialize­d interventi­ons.

We’ve worked tirelessly to make our schools a safe haven for our students, and to make sure that we can meet more than just their educationa­l needs. Unfortunat­ely, the way Connecticu­t schools are funded is the biggest obstacle to our success.

We struggle with predictabi­lity. We have a state budget and city budgets that are often determined months past deadline, resulting in us planning for our school year while blind to what resources will actually be available. Could you plan your family budget without knowing how much money will come into your household each month? It’s virtually impossible to do this and creates fear and uncertaint­y among school and district staff.

We struggle with fairness. Increasing legislativ­e requiremen­t without resources, therefore eroding core instructio­n and increasing equity and access for urban students, undermines their access to a fundamenta­lly basic education. Our cities do not have the luxury of levying extensive local taxes, and so when cuts are made by the state, our students feel the impact directly, in terms of cuts to services and teaching staff.

We struggle with regulatory burdens. Legislativ­e initiative­s are often well intended, but our districts are disproport­ionately burdened by the impact of unfunded mandates. As the state passes more and more laws that dictate what we must do, rarely does it come with funding attached. We cannot afford to be saddled by these burdensome requiremen­ts that take away from instructio­nal resources.

With new governing administra­tions comes fear that the state will reinvent the wheel, and that progress will be disrupted due to change for change’s sake. Specifical­ly, our urban school districts have seen success as a direct result of a program initiated recently by state leaders: the Alliance District program. This was created specifical­ly to target high-need school districts like ours, and to ensure additional resources are appropriat­ed and tied to specific interventi­ons. Furthermor­e, these funds are now embedded in our districts’ core functions and so any eliminatio­n would result in painful cuts to services and programs that would mean layoffs and direct impacts on students. The Alliance District program demonstrat­ed a recognitio­n that urban school districts have challenges that require special interventi­on, and we are hopeful that our incoming state leaders keep these programs going into the next biennium.

We know that times are tough in Connecticu­t. As urban superinten­dents it’s our job to demand that, even during tough times, we put students first. We hope that incoming state leaders share our commitment to ensuring that our state’s most vulnerable children are uniquely cared for and prioritize­d in the state budget. They are depending on all of us to stand up for them.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States