The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Lamont has convincing to do on tolls

-

The toll debate has been percolatin­g for a few years now. As it gets ready to boil, someone needs to turn down the heat.

The debate is cast as pro-toll vs. antitoll. In Connecticu­t, that can also be shorthande­d as Democrats vs. Republican­s.

It’s not that black and white. First of all, as much as toll proponents like to point to support from constituen­ts, no one really wants tolls.

Republican­s carry most of the weight on the antitoll side of the see-saw. They eviscerate­d former Gov. Dannel P. Malloy when he ordered a $10 million tolls study in July. A notable outlier among Democrats has been newly minted Gov. Ned Lamont.

Until now.

On Saturday, Lamont published an op-ed (“A path going forward”) in Hearst Connecticu­t Media newspapers in which he suggested the state’s economic picture looks even bleaker under the gold dome than it did when he was in the private sector.

Lamont conceded tolls must be considered. Criticism that he flip-flopped were about as shocking as midday traffic but must not become a distractio­n.

It’s time to talk about tolls.

Lamont and what he described as “my co-equal branch of government” can only get out of this traffic jam by working together.

The best place to start is for Lamont to share the informatio­n that steered him in a new direction.

When he delivers his first state budget Wednesday, he must show where else he plans to find money. Hitting the tolls panic button in his first 100 days is akin to taking out a second mortgage to avoid cutting personal expenses.

The state of the highway system in Connecticu­t is not up for debate — it’s terrible. Commuters regularly pencil in an hour or more to make it 20 miles up the highway at certain times of day. Repairs are overdue, most upgrades far out of reach.

The high gas tax doesn’t cover costs, and intake is going down. That’s a good thing — less money from the gas tax means people are spending less on gasoline, either by increasing efficiency or cutting back on driving. We encourage both trends.

But the money has to come from somewhere. Many residents in border towns contribute to highway funds of New York, Massachuse­tts and New Jersey. From their perspectiv­e, there is already an injustice to commuters in the opposite direction getting a free ride.

Lamont has talked about a discount for in-state drivers. That’s a necessity and would have to come at the point of payment, not in the form of a rebate weeks or months later. Too many people are barely getting by, and an extra few dollars for the privilege of commuting will make a real difference. The state can’t ignore this segment of the population.

The governor clearly sees a different horizon for Connecticu­t than he did a few months ago. We need convincing, too. In the days to come, he’ll get his chance to persuade toll opponents to stop pumping the brakes.

The state of the highway system in Connecticu­t is not up for debate — it’s terrible. Repairs are overdue, most upgrades far out of reach.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States