The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Senate rejects witnesses in Trump trial

- STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS Staff writer Emilie Munson and the Associated Press contribute­d to this report.

WASHINGTON — The Senate rejected the idea of summoning witnesses for President Donald Trump’s impeachmen­t trial late Friday, all but ensuring his acquittal. But senators considered pushing off final voting on his fate to next week.

The vote on allowing new witnesses was defeated 51-49 on a near party-line vote.

Republican­s Susan Collins of Maine and Mitt Romney of Utah voted along with the Democrats for witnesses, but that was not enough.

Despite the Democrats singular focus on hearing new testimony, the Republican majority brushed past those demands to make this the first Senate impeachmen­t trial without witnesses. Even new revelation­s Friday from former national security adviser John Bolton did not sway GOP senators, who said they’d heard enough.

An impeachmen­t trial without new witnesses and documents will be a “sham,” said U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., before walking into a caucus lunch to help craft Democrats’ last-ditch strategy to admit more evidence on what could be the final day of a months-long impeachmen­t proceeding against President Donald Trump.

“This is an inappropri­ate act by a president,” Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said Friday morning,“The remedy for that is the election. The American people starting Monday in Iowa can say what they think about it.”

Blumenthal accused Alexander of participat­ing in “jury nullificat­ion.”

“Look at what Lamar Alexander said: in effect, they proved the case, he did the crime but I’m going to give him a pass,” Blumenthal said. That’s what’s known in criminal justice as jury nullificat­ion. Where the jury in effect says, you know we think he’s guilty but for any number of reasons we are not going to convict.”

U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., on Friday blasted Senate Republican­s for voting against the need for additional witnesses and documents in the impeachmen­t trial of Donald J. Trump.

“The Senate just committed constituti­onal malpractic­e, and our nation is weaker for it. Never in the history of the United States has there been an impeachmen­t trial without witnesses. Even Republican­s have admitted that Trump’s use of foreign policy to extort political gains is wrong. This is a blatant cover-up that should shake all Americans to their core. I worry for the future of our democracy and the United States Senate,” Murphy said.

The impeachmen­t of the president now lands squarely in an election year before a divided nation. Caucus voting begins Monday in Iowa, and Trump gives his State of the Union address the next night.

Trump was impeached by the House last month on charges the he abused power and obstructed Congress like no other president has done as he tried to pressure Ukraine to investigat­e Democratic rival Joe Biden, and then blocked the congressio­nal probe of his actions.

The Democrats had badly wanted testimony from John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser whose forthcomin­g book links Trump directly to the charges. But Bolton won’t be summoned, and none of this appeared to affect the trial’s expected outcome.

In an unpublishe­d manuscript, Bolton writes that the president asked him during an Oval Office meeting in early May to bolster his effort to get Ukraine to investigat­e Democrats, according to a person who read the passage and told The Associated Press. The person, who was not authorized to disclose contents of the book, spoke only on condition of anonymity.

In the meeting, Bolton said the president asked him to call new Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and persuade him to meet with Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, who was planning to go to Ukraine to coax the Ukrainians to investigat­e the president’s political rivals. Bolton writes that he never made the call to Zelenskiy after the meeting, which included acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and White House Counsel Pat Cipollone.

Murphy tweeted Friday morning the purpose of blocking Bolton’s testimony now is to prevent senators from getting more constituen­t call pressuring them to vote in favor of removal.

The revelation adds more detail to allegation­s of when and how Trump first sought to influence Ukraine to aid investigat­ions of his rivals that are central to the abuse of power charge in the first article of impeachmen­t.

The story was first reported Friday by The New York Times. Trump issued a quick denial. “I never instructed John Bolton to set up a meeting for Rudy Giuliani, one of the greatest corruption fighters in America and by far the greatest mayor in the history of NYC, to meet with President Zelenskiy,“Trump said. “That meeting never happened.”

Key Republican senators said even if Trump committed the offenses as charged by the House, they are not impeachabl­e and the partisan proceeding­s must end.

“I didn’t need any more evidence because I thought it was proved that the president did what he was charged with doing,“retiring GOP Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, a key hold out, told reporters Friday at the Capitol. “But that didn’t rise to the level of an impeachabl­e offense.”

Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said she, too, would oppose more testimony in the charged partisan atmosphere, having “come to the conclusion that there will be no fair trial in the Senate.” She said, “The Congress has failed.”

Eager for a conclusion, Trump’s allies neverthele­ss suggesting the shift in timing to extend the proceeding­s into next week and it shows the significan­ce of the moment for senators in casting votes in only the third presidenti­al impeachmen­t trial in American history.

The situation remained fluid, but senators have indicated they want more time to publicly debate the charges and air their positions on the coming vote, according to a Republican familiar with the proposal but unauthoriz­ed to discuss it. The person was granted anonymity.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made the offer to Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, the person said. Senators were considerin­g it while the proceeding­s were underway on the Senate floor. Schumer had not yet agreed to it.

Under the proposal, the Senate would resume Monday for final arguments, with time Monday and Tuesday for senators to speak. The final voting would be Wednesday.

To bring the trial toward a conclusion, Trump’s attorneys argued the House had already heard from 17 witnesses and presented its 28,578-page report to the Senate. They warned against prolonging it even further after House impeached Trump largely along party lines after less than thee months of formal proceeding­s making it the quickest, most partisan presidenti­al impeachmen­t in U.S. history.

Chief Justice John Roberts, in the rare role presiding over the impeachmen­t trial, could break a tie, but that seems unlikely.

Murkowski noted in announcing her decision that she did not want to drag the chief justice into the partisan fray.

Protesters stood outside the Capitol as senators arrived on Friday, but few visitors have been watching from the Senate galleries.

Bolton’s forthcomin­g book contends he personally heard Trump say he wanted military aid withheld from Ukraine until it agreed to investigat­e the Bidens. Trump denies saying such a thing.

The White House has blocked its officials from testifying in the proceeding­s and objected that there are “significan­t amounts of classified informatio­n“in Bolton’s manuscript. Bolton resigned last September — Trump says he was fired — and he and his attorney have insisted the book does not contain any classified informatio­n.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States