Legislator outage outrage was phony

Last week’s hearings of the state Public Utilities Regulatory Authority and the General Assembly gave many elected officials their chance to denounce the state’s two major electric companies, Eversource Energy and United Illuminating, over rising electric bills and the long and widespread outages after the recent tropical storm.

But the hearings didn’t vindicate the piling on done by the politicians.

For it turned out that power had been restored well within the time requirements already set by the utility authority. Additionally, news reports tended to support Eversource’s contention that most of the recent increase in electric bills has resulted, first, from greatly increased customer use of electricity as people stay home because of the virus epidemic and run much more air-conditioning during hot weather, and, second, from the state law that recently took effect requiring Eversource to buy power from the Millstone nuclear plant in Waterford to keep the plant going.

In effect that law hid another tax in electricity bills, and as usual and as anticipated, the people, uninformed, blamed the electric company instead of their state legislators and the governor.

On top of that, the Connecticut Mirror’s Mark Pazniokas reported that only 34 percent of charges on Eversource electric bills is attributable to the utility itself. The remaining two-thirds of charges come from the cost of electricity, which Eversource does not produce but buys from generators chosen by its customers; from state and federal government assessments on electricity transmission; and from state government-required subsidies for renewable energy, energy-efficiency programs and the poor.

Eversource representatives at the hearings had the political sense to take their beating calmly and not challenge elected officials over their responsibility for the high cost of electricity in the state. Of course the elected officials did not volunteer to accept their responsibility. They just wanted to strike indignant poses for the television cameras.

But at least Sen. Matt Lesser, D-Middletown, urged the utility authority to declare “force majeure” and nullify Eversource’s power purchase arrangement with Millstone, in effect canceling the new law.

Given the disproportion in responsibility here — two-thirds for government and non-utility electricity costs and only one third for the utility stuck with collecting the money for others — the electricity issue may fade quickly since the elected officials have already achieved so much television time for chest thumping.

With the six-month term of his emergency powers to govern by decree expiring on Sept. 9, Governor Lamont is likely to ask the leaders of the General Assembly to extend them for another few months. While the virus epidemic has sharply subsided in Connecticut, recent flare-ups like the ones in Danbury and at the Storrs campus of the University of Connecticut could lead to a second wave, especially since many people have begun partying as if there is no longer any risk.

But the governor and legislative leaders should let the emergency powers lapse. The epidemic never was severe enough to justify suspending democratic government, and now that the epidemic has largely lifted, it is time for the General Assembly to get back to work, which it abandoned in cowardly panic in March midway through its regular session.

Legislators are far too content to leave potentially controversial policy decisions to the governor as their campaigns for re-election begin. Though the governor has ruled benignly, these decisions have been made without ordinary public discussion and without putting legislators on the record. Important issues having nothing to do with the epidemic have been neglected entirely. Even if legislators face up to their responsibility for Connecticut’s high electricity costs, which is unlikely, another few months of gubernatorial rule will delay action until next year.

Ordinary legislative operations can resume safely with mask wearing and internet proceedings. After all, isn’t it ridiculous to classify supermarket employees, trash collectors, and mail carriers as essential workers but not the people chosen to make the laws and evaluate government operations? Their salaries are not large but legislators should start earning them again.