The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Foreign-based price controls make no sense

- By Paul R. Pescatello Paul Pescatello is co-chairman of We Work for Health Connecticu­t and executive director and senior counsel for the CBIA’s Bioscience Growth Council.

It’s troubling that the Trump administra­tion has elected to move forward with such a misguided policy — a decision that places health care access and innovation at risk.

The ongoing coronaviru­s pandemic is a cause of much anxiety and uncertaint­y — how long will it last, and when will effective COVID treatments be available and what will they cost? Indeed, surveys indicate that a substantia­l number of Connecticu­t residents — 54 percent — are “worried” or “very worried” about affording treatment for COVID-19 .

People fear that, for the average American, effective coronaviru­s treatment may be out of reach. Unfortunat­ely, these fears are not entirely unfounded. While the health care industry is working at an unpreceden­ted pace and redirectin­g a huge proportion of research and developmen­t budgets to creating, manufactur­ing and making accessible COVID-19 treatments and vaccines, the Trump administra­tion has adopted policies that undermine this effort.

This fall, the Trump administra­tion released an executive order it marketed as a means to lower U.S. health care costs. This Most Favored Nation executive order, or MFN, attempts to control health care costs by imposing distorted foreignbas­ed price controls over Medicare Part B and Part D. MFN mandates that Medicare’s prescripti­on drug prices must reflect the lowest price among several foreign “reference” nations.

The administra­tion argues that this rule would make Medicare more affordable by reducing the cost of medicines. In the real world, however, MFN might reduce costs slightly at the price of dramatical­ly reducing supply and access.

The cost of certain medicines in some countries is lower than in the U.S. because their government­s arbitraril­y set prices essentiall­y just above the cost of manufactur­ing the drug. A book isn’t just the cost of paper and printing, and a smartphone isn’t just the cost of the plastic and metal of which it’s made. Similarly, once the “recipe” for a drug is figured out after years of research and developmen­t, manufactur­ing it is generally not that costly. Most of the cost is bound up in the scientists and the complex, highly sophistica­ted labs and clinical trials necessary to work out the recipe for an effective treatment or cure. Unlike just about any other product — except perhaps a new space vehicle— developing a new medicine takes a huge amount of time and vast financial resources — approximat­ely 12 years and $2.6 billion per drug.

Other countries freeload on the U.S. biopharma’s investment in research and developmen­t, siphoning medicines off our supply chain below cost. But if we adopt their prices new drug developmen­t will evaporate and the drug manufactur­ing delivery supply chain will wither. The result: America’s innovation machine on life support and drug shortages for consumers.

An independen­t analysis has already dispelled the idea that MFN will generate health care savings. A Kaiser Family Foundation study found that “most people are unlikely to see drug cost savings from President Trump’s ‘Most Favored Nation’ proposal.” This result is unsurprisi­ng — government-mandated price controls never authentica­lly reduce costs longterm. Rather, MFN, like other poorly crafted health care policies, would merely shift the cost burden to a third party. If that third party — in this instance, the biopharmac­eutical industry — cannot recoup its investment­s, the results will be disastrous.

By reducing the price of prescripti­on drugs to below-market levels, MFN compels biopharmac­eutical manufactur­ers to accept persistent losses. As a result, biopharmac­eutical companies will have fewer resources for the production of existing medication­s and the creation of effective new treatments. Health care access will decrease dramatical­ly, and medical innovation will plummet as biopharmac­eutical companies struggle under the financial handicaps imposed by MFN.

It’s troubling that the Trump administra­tion has elected to move forward with such a misguided policy as that reflected in the MFN — a decision that places health care access and innovation at risk. Worse still, they’ve done so amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Americans need the biopharmac­eutical industry working at full speed more than any other time in recent history. MFN saps biopharmac­eutical resources when they’re needed most and places Americans’ health care in jeopardy. Clearly, the administra­tion’s executive order needs a reboot.

 ?? Tyler Sizemore / Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? Drive-thru COVID-19 tests administer­ed in Greenwich last week.
Tyler Sizemore / Hearst Connecticu­t Media Drive-thru COVID-19 tests administer­ed in Greenwich last week.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States