The Register Citizen (Torrington, CT)

Reproducti­ve rights battle hits next level

- By Dr. Blake Shultz and Dr. Sara Tannenbaum

The leak of the draft Supreme Court opinion overturnin­g the landmark abortion rights case, Roe v. Wade, sparked a flurry of protests around the country. The news raised concerns that other federal protection­s will be rolled back, including the right to birth control. In response to this federal volatility, a number of states have acted to protect access to abortion, and to reproducti­ve health care more generally. Laudably, Gov. Ned Lamont led the nation in signing legislatio­n protecting and expanding access to abortion in Connecticu­t, but the state should go further, by taking urgent action to expand access to contracept­ion.

As health care profession­als, we believe it is imperative that Connecticu­t allow pharmacist­s to prescribe hormonal birth control directly to patients. Connecticu­t lags behind many peer states in its failure to take this step. To date, 17 states and the District of Columbia allow pharmacist­prescribed contracept­ion, and 29 similar state bills have been introduced this year. Both neighborin­g Rhode Island and Massachuse­tts are considerin­g similar proposals this legislativ­e cycle, with significan­t support from community advocates.

Even though birth control pills have been legal for decades, many women face problems obtaining them. This issue is particular­ly acute in Connecticu­t. According to data released by Power to Decide, an advocacy organizati­on, an estimated 180,000 lower-income women in our state live in “contracept­ive deserts,” facing significan­t barriers to contracept­ive access. Nationally, 30 percent of surveyed women who tried to obtain a prescripti­on for birth control reported difficulti­es. Two of the most frequently cited barriers were not having a doctor and trouble getting an appointmen­t. One of us, a gynecology resident, recently saw a patient who became pregnant while waiting months for a birth control appointmen­t. Allowing pharmacist­s to prescribe birth control would dramatical­ly decrease these delays in care and promote equitable access.

Over half of women who did not want to become pregnant reported it would be a “big personal advantage” to have pharmacist-prescribed birth control, and 41 percent of those not using contracept­ives said they would start if available from pharmacist­s. Physicians, too, are broadly supportive of increasing access to contracept­ives at the pharmacy level, with the American College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynecologi­sts and American Academy of Family Physicians releasing opinions going a step further, supporting over-the-counter access even without a pharmacist’s prescripti­on.

This broad support is due, in part, to evidence demonstrat­ing the safety of over-the-counter and pharmacist-prescribed contracept­ion. Evidence of the general safety of oral contracept­ives is overwhelmi­ng, and they are taken by 14 percent of women aged 15-49. However, hormonal contracept­ion, like any drug, carries risks. Of particular concern for combined birth control pills — those with both estrogen and progestin — is the risk for blood clots, a rare complicati­on that is more likely in women with identifiab­le underlying health conditions.

In Oregon, where pharmacist prescribed birth control is already legal, a study showed that pharmacist­s are comparable to physicians in their ability to identify these health problems. Several additional studies demonstrat­e that patients themselves are capable of self-screening their eligibilit­y for hormonal contracept­ives, leading to ACOG’s recommenda­tion that hormonal contracept­ion ultimately be available over-thecounter and without age restrictio­ns. Connecticu­t now has a pressing opportunit­y to adopt the “intermedia­te step” in ACOG’s recommenda­tion — allowing pharmacist­s to prescribe contracept­ion.

With the overturnin­g of Roe v. Wade imminent, and the threat of further reduced federal protection­s, legislator­s must act swiftly to protect reproducti­ve freedom in Connecticu­t. This not only includes ensuring continued access to abortion, but expanding access to contracept­ion, as well. Allowing pharmacist­s to prescribe contracept­ives is a key step in such an expansion, by reducing the significan­t delays and costs involved in seeing a physician, in addition to reducing the current strain on the health care system. Existing protection­s must also be shorn up, and support given to federal reform where possible. Connecticu­t is a national leader in protecting access to health care, and should continue to lead by urgently expanding access to contracept­ion for all who need it.

Dr. Blake Shultz is a fellow at the Solomon Center for Health Law and Policy at Yale Law School and an incoming emergency medicine resident at MGH/Brigham Hospitals. He is a recent graduate of Yale School of Medicine and Yale Law School, as well as Cornell University. Dr. Sara Tannenbaum is a senior resident OBGYN physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital. She is a graduate of Harvard University and Yale School of Medicine.

 ?? Associated Press ?? A protester wears a birth control pill costume as she protests in front of the Supreme Court in Washington in 2014.
Associated Press A protester wears a birth control pill costume as she protests in front of the Supreme Court in Washington in 2014.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States