The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

Hatfield board gives informal go-ahead for townhouse plans

- By DAN SOKIL dsokil@thereporte­ronline.com

HATFIELD — It’s not a formal approval, and plans could still change, but the proposal to build 65 townhouses and twins at the intersecti­on of Cowpath and Lenhart roads took a big step forward Wednesday night.

Three of Hatfield’s five commission­ers gave their assent for resident Sal Moscariell­o and attorney Joe Kuhls to further refine the latest version of plans the board had rejected in November.

“Three of us are saying that it’s not objectiona­ble, and we are willing to have you go through planning and zoning (processes), have the conversati­on with them, go through that process, and you have a right to a rezoning hearing in May,” said commission­ers President Tom Zipfel.

At issue are plans - several sets of plans - presented to the board over the past several months for possible proj- ects on an eight-acre parcel at Cowpath and Lenhart. Moscariell­o and Kuhls originally presented plans to build a total of 70 townhomes and a 108-space parking lot near the railroad tracks running through that site, plans which would have required the property to be rezoned and which the board voted to reject in November. The two presented an alternativ­e plan for a 300-bed nursing facility - allowed by-right without any rezoning - or a downsized townhouse plan earlier this month, and the commission­ers and residents discussed at length which plans they’d prefer to see become a reality, and whether they’d prefer the townhouse plans be vetted by the township’s Planning and Zoning committee or the byright nursing facility that would need fewer permission­s.

“Right now, you have an eight-acre unimproved parcel in a high traffic area that is not going to remain unim- proved,” said Kuhls.

Traffic study data project that the downsized townhouse and twin complex would create roughly 443 average weekday trips of traffic from that parcel, when compared to an estimated 920 average weekday - and Moscariell­o would contribute a traffic signal worth roughly $250,000 at that intersecti­on if the townhouse plans are approved, but not the commercial building, he and Kuhls told the board.

“What we’re offering you is the possibilit­y of half the traffic of what is permitted today, and a traffic light. That, to me, is quite a solution to an existing problem,” he said.

Final design details and engineerin­g would still be worked out through the land developmen­t process in consultati­on with township staff and consultant­s, but the applicant and the board have been sparring over the proposal for months - whether the zoning change for the townhous- es would be less objectiona­ble than the nursing facility that could generate more traffic and be built with fewer public improvemen­ts.

“Usually a developer brings the ugly plan first, they say ‘Here is my ugly plan, here is my nursing home facility,’ get everybody all riled up, and then say ‘This is what I was thinking about,’” commission­er Gerry Andris said.

“The unfortunat­e part is Sal recognized this wasn’t a good idea, to put a nursing home on. He came in with what he thought would make the most sense,” Andris said, and when compared to the nursing facility he said he’d rather see the townhouse plan.

Commission­er Robert Rodgers said he thought the applicants were “getting a little bit closer; I don’t think you’re there yet, and I don’t want to lead you on” before the approval process, so he cast an informal vote against the townhouse plan.

Commission­er Scott Brown also cast an informal vote against, saying he did so “under the caveat that I can learn and change my mind by the time we get to the target date (for final approval), if there’s going to be one.”

Zipfel and commission­er Larry Hughes both gave their assent to moving ahead with the land developmen­t process, and emphasized that a no vote on the townhouse plans would guarantee that the nursing clinic would be built with little input from township residents, consultant­s or the board.

“If we give them a hearing, OK, they come back in front of planning and zoning and we get to tweak that plan to where we like it. If you don’t give them a hearing, you don’t get to tweak that plan,” Hughes said.

Hatfield’s Planning and Zoning committee next meets at 9 a.m. on March 24 and the township commission­ers next meet at 7:30 p.m. on March 12, both at the township administra­tion building, 1950 School Road. For more informatio­n or meeting agendas and materials visit www. HatfieldTo­wnship.org or follow @HatfieldPA on Twitter.

Follow staff writer Dan SokilonTwi­tter@DanSokil. For breaking news SMS alerts from The Reporter, text LANNEWS to 22700 from your mobile phone. *Msg & data rates may apply. For help, text HELP. To cancel, text STOP.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States