State’s pot law gets a B-minus
Report compares laws in 44 states where legalization has occurred
As a rush of medical marijuana investors flood Southeastern Pennsylvania in the scramble to obtain one of the two growing permits allotted to the region, the law that makes it all possible is already being graded.
Pennsylvania’s medical marijuana law, enacted last April, has received a B-minus in the annual report from Americans for Safe Access, “a national member-based organization of patients, medical professionals, scientists and concerned citizens promoting safe and legal access to cannabis for therapeutic use and research,” which is how their web site describes their mission.
“We’re hoping next year, Pennsylvania’s grade will stay constant or even go up,” said Steph Sherer, executive director at Americans for Safe Access.
The report, “A Patient-Focused Analysis of the Patchwork of State Laws,” determines grades by setting a number of fixed parameters, such as “patient rights/civil protection,” “access to medicine,” and “consumer safety and provider requirement” and measuring the laws in each of the 44 states which have made medical marijuana legal against those benchmarks.
Pennsylvania’s law — not yet fully implemented — received high marks for its functionality and ease of navigation, neither of which has been field-tested yet as the medicine is not yet being distributed.
It received lower marks for protections of patient rights, access to medicine and the lowest (37 out of 100) for consumer safety and provider requirements, but mostly that’s because ASA wants to see how they are implemented, said Sherer.
“If Pennsylvania can move through the implementation process in a timely manner and adopt strong product safety protocols, like those outlined in this report, it could be one of the stronger programs in the country,” she said.
Since Pennsylvania passed its law last year, five other states have legalized recreational use of marijuana and four more have passed medicinal use bills.
ASA was very involved in the crafting of Pennsylvania’s law and Sherer singled out Lebanon Countybased state Sen. Mike Folmer, R-48th Dist., for his advocacy.
“The thing that stood out for us in Pennsylvania was the very real compassion that the lawmakers had for the patients and they really made sure it was a patientcentered law,” she said.
The law was co-sponsored by Montgomery County Democrat Daylin Leach, D-17th Dist.
Sherer faulted Pennsylvania’s law for not allowing home cultivation, which will delay access to patients who need relief now, and for failing to change intoxicated driving laws, which means that patients using marijuana-based products can still be arrested for DUI, as well as prohibitions against smoking the products.
“The best word for it is ‘inhalation’ and medically speaking, that’s really the gold standard of delivery systems, it doesn’t have to go through your stomach or skin, it’s the fastest way to the blood stream,” Sherer said.
“But I understand the optics and we can’t undo decades of propaganda around cannabis,” said Sherer, noting that Pennsylvania’s law has a “very comprehensive” list of medical ailments for which medical marijuana products can be prescribed.
“I think Pennsylvania’s law is going to work well because they are focused on implementing it quickly, so they have taken a phased approach which, as a businessman, I think is very astute,” said Jon Cohn.
He is the chief operating officer of Keystone Medical Cannabis LLC, which Wednesday night pitched its proposal for a growing and processing facility in the Titan Steel building at 740 Queen St. in Pottstown.
“So where we lost points (in the Americans for Safe Access report) is more because the system has not been put in place yet than because of it being poorly designed,” Cohn said of Pennsylvania’s law. “Some of the parameters have not been defined because they come later in the process. For example, there’s no reason to hold up licensing a facility getting it started because you want to write rules for something that hasn’t even grown one plant yet.”
Many of the law’s flaws and benefits will be played out in Southeast Pennsylvania, which has fully 40 percent of the Commonwealth’s potential patients, according to the research Cohn’s presented to Pottstown borough council.
It is just one of a halfdozen proposals appearing before municipal boards seeking approval and support in the quest for the two grow permits and 10 dispensary permits that will be issued by the state for the six-county region.
“My partner told me today that there are already 25 applications for this region,” Cohn told Digital First Media Friday.
Perhaps that the interest is due to the fact that Southeast Pennsylvania has four of the 30 largest cancer centers in the United States and has the largest number of post traumatic stress disorder and pain management patients in the state, according to Cohn’s research.
Cohn said if successful, his enterprise hopes to engage with Veterans Administration doctors to see if medical marijuana can be used to treat not only pain, but also the PTSD often experienced by vets.
He also pointed out that using marijuana-derived products for pain management could help reduce the opioid crisis currently ravaging Pennsylvania and other states.
Sherer agreed, and pointed to the reference in the ASA report that a 2014 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association found that states which have legalized medical marijuana have an opioid overdose mortality rate nearly 25 percent lower than those which do not.
Sherer’s advocacy has more than just professional meaning for her.
When she was in her 20s, she was suffering from a disease called dystonia, an inflammation disorder, and the pharmaceuticals she was taking for it were causing liver failure.
“So I had a choice between being on dialysis for the rest of my life, or not being able to get out of bed. One day my doctor came in, shut the door and asked if I used marijuana. I said ‘no’ and he asked if I knew where I could get some and at first I thought he wanted me to get some for him,” Sherer said with a laugh.
“But he said no, he had other patients who were responding well to using it and suggested I give it a try and that was 16 years ago,” Sherer said. “I have no idea where I would be right now without it. And then I realized there must be other like me and there wasn’t really anyone advocating for this from a patient’s perspective,” which is how ASA, which turns 15 in April, got started.
“Really, we believe the best case scenario is for the state to get out of the way of the relationship between doctor and patient and leave medicine up to the doctors, but as laws go, I’m cautiously optimistic that Pennsylvania’s may be one of the best in the country,” Sherer said.