The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

Manufactur­ing uptick offsets drop in new housing starts

- Joel Naroff

April Housing Starts and Industrial Production KEY DATA » Starts: -2.6 percent; 1-Family: +0.4 percent; Permits: -2.5 percent; 1-Family: -4.5 percent/ IP: +1.0 percent; Manufactur­ing: +1.0 percent

Columnist IN A NUTSHELL » “The pickup in manufactur­ing activity comes at the right time as home constructi­on seems to have hit a lull.”

WHAT IT MEANS » Watch what people do, not what they say. Monday, surveys indicated that housing was moving forward strongly but manufactur­ing may be slowing. At least that is what the respondent­s said.

Well, Tuesday’s data indicate the exact opposite happened in April. First, home constructi­on slowed. Housing starts fell, though the decline was driven by a slowdown in the alwaysvola­tile multi-family segment. Sharp reductions in building activity in the Northeast and South overwhelme­d solid increases in the Midwest and West.

Looking forward, permit requests were off as well. Since permit requests outpaced starts over the past three months – and were well above the April level – look for a pop in starts in May. That, however, will just bring us back to an average pace.

Industrial production jumped in April and the rise was broad based. Not only did we have a nice increase in utility production, but the energy sector rebounded significan­tly and manufactur­ing output surged. Eight of the 11 durable goods manufactur­ing segments and seven of the eight nondurable sectors posted gains. The biggest increases were in vehicles and petroleum. It is nice that the energy sector is growing rather than contractin­g sharply as it did last year. As for the pop in assembly rates, unless sales pick up, we are could see some shaving in output. There was also a large rise in the production of computers and business equipment, indicating firms may be investing again. That would be good news for growth this quarter. MARKETS AND FED POLICY IMPLICATIO­NS » The sharp increase in industrial activity is a clear sign that the first quarter sluggishne­ss is behind us. But we have to be cautious in reading these numbers. March was a strange month and the April data have averaged out the ups and downs. What we need to see is consistent­ly good numbers, not one bad and one good.

A 3 percent or more second quarter will not indicate the economy is in off to the races. It will, however, make it possible we don’t have another sub-2 percent growth rate. My point is that the data are volatile and if the March and April numbers were switched, we probably would have two quarters both in the 2.25 percent range. Big deal. Given that investors seem to be turning a blind eye to any negative informatio­n but are celebratin­g anything that looks good, I suspect they will cheer the production report and skip the housing numbers. But they shouldn’t. The April starts number was almost 6 percent below the average for the first quarter and it will be hard to get above 3 percent growth if housing isn’t ex-

panding. That is especially true given the less than stellar vehicle sales. I point all this out to make the point that I just don’t

know where the earnings will come from to support the constant increase in equity prices. It is doubtful is will come from domestic activity. As for the Fed, it produces the industrial production report and the large increase adds to the belief that the next rate hike is coming very soon.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States