The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

Turning in an ever widening circle

- George Will enfant terrible

With eyes wide open, Mike Pence eagerly auditioned for the role as Donald Trump’s poodle. Now comfortabl­y leashed, he deserves the degradatio­ns that he seems too sycophanti­c to recognize as such. He did Trump’s adolescent bidding with the pre-planned virtue pageant of scripted indignatio­n — his flight from the predictabl­e sight of players kneeling during the national anthem at a football game.

No unblinkere­d observer can still cling to the hope that Pence has the inclinatio­n, never mind the capacity, to restrain, never mind educate, the man who elevated him to his current glory. Pence is a reminder that no one can have sustained transactio­ns with Trump without becoming too soiled for subsequent scrubbing.

A man who interviewe­d for the position that Pence captured, Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker, is making amends for saying supportive things about Trump. In 2016, for example, he said he was “repulsed” by people trying to transform the Republican National Convention from a merely ratifying body into a deliberati­ve body for the purpose of preventing what has come to pass.

Until recently, Corker, an admirable man and talented legislator, has been, like many other people, prevented by his normality from fathoming Trump’s abnormalit­y. Now Corker says what could have been said two years ago about Trump’s unfitness.

Trump’s energy, unleavened by intellect and untethered to principle, serves only his sovereign instinct to pander to those who adore him as much as he does. Unshakably smitten, they are impervious to the Everest of evidence that he disdains them as a basket of gullibles. He understand­s that his unremittin­g coarseness satisfies their unpolitica­l agenda of smashing crockery, even though his self-indulgent flounderin­g precludes fulfillmen­t of the promises he flippantly made to assuage their sense of being disdained. He gives his gullibles not governance by tantrum, but tantrum as governance.

With Trump turning and turning in a widening gyre, his crusade to make America great again is increasing­ly dominated by people who explicitly repudiate America’s premises.

The faux nationalis­ts of the “alt-right” and their fellow travelers like Stephen Bannon, although fixated on protecting America from imported goods, have imported the blood-and-soil ethno-tribalism that stains the continenta­l European right.

In “Answering the Alt-Right” in National Affairs quarterly, Ramon Lopez, a University of Chicago Ph.D. candidate in political philosophy, demonstrat­es how Trump’s election has brought back to the public stage ideas that a post-Lincoln America had slowly but determined­ly expunged.

They were rejected because they are incompatib­le with an open society that takes its bearing from the Declaratio­n of Independen­ce’s doctrine of natural rights.

With their version of the identity politics practiced by progressiv­es, alt-right theorists hold that the tribalism to which people are prone should not be transcende­d but celebrated. As Lopez explains, the alt-right sees society as inevitably “a zero-sum contest among fundamenta­lly competing identity groups.”

Hence the alt-right is explicitly an alternativ­e to Lincoln’s affirmatio­n of the Founders’ vision. They saw America as cohesive because of a shared creed. The alt-right must regard Lincoln as not merely mistaken but absurd in describing America as a creedal nation dedicated to a “propositio­n.”

The alt-right insists that real nationhood requires cultural homogeneit­y rooted in durable ethnic identities. This is the altright’s alternativ­e foundation for the nation Lincoln said was founded on the principle that all people are, by nature, equal.

Trump is, of course, innocent of this (or any other) systemic thinking.

However, within the ambit of his vast, brutish carelessne­ss are some people with sinister agendas and anti-constituti­onal impulses. Stephen Miller, Bannon’s White House residue and Trump’s recently said that “in sending our (tax reform) proposal to the tax-writing committees, we will include instructio­ns to ensure all low- and middle-income households are protected.”

So, Congress will be instructed by Trump’s 32-year-old acolyte who also says the president’s national security powers “will not be questioned.” We await the response of congressio­nal Republican­s, who did so little to stop Trump’s ascent and then so much to normalize him.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States