The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

This pro-life conservati­ve celebrates Democrat’s win

- Michael Gerson Columnist

I find myself wandering in an unfamiliar place. As a prolife conservati­ve, I am honestly happy — no, positively elated — that pro-choice Democrat Doug Jones won Alabama’s Senate election.

It is an odd position for me, and a complicate­d one. This change may impose costs to causes I care about. And Democrats did not make my shift of sentiments any easier. A pro-life Democrat (there used to be herds of such unicorns before they were hunted to near extinction) would have won the Alabama race going away, and left me entirely unconflict­ed.

But even so, it was not a close decision. In reality, the chance that the flip of this seat would somehow determine the fate of Roe v. Wade is vanishingl­y small. And political leadership does not consist entirely of checking policy boxes. What needs to be considered is the net effect on the country and the cause.

And the Alabama election was like looking into the abyss. Roy Mooreism was distilled Trumpism, flavored with some selfrighte­ous moralism. It was all there: the aggressive ignorance, the racial divisivene­ss, the disdain for governing, the contempt for truth, the accusation­s of sexual predation, the (just remarkable) trashing of America in favor of Vladimir Putin, the conspiracy theories, the sheer, destabiliz­ing craziness of the average day.

Trump and his admirers are not just putting forth an agenda; they are littering the civic arena with deception and cruelty. They are discrediti­ng even the good causes they claim to care about. They are condemning the country to durable social division.

The president has crossed line after line of decency and ethics with only scattered Republican bleats of protest. Most of the party remains in complicit silence. The few elected officials who have broken with Trump have become targets of the conservati­ve media complex — savaged as an example to the others.

This is the sad logic of Republican politics today: The only way that elected Republican­s will abandon Trump is if they see it as in their self-interest. And the only way they will believe it is in their self-interest is to watch a considerab­le number of their fellow Republican­s lose.

It is necessary to look these facts full in the face. In the end, the restoratio­n of the Republican Party will require Republican­s to lose elections. It will require Republican voters — as in Alabama and (to some extent) Virginia — to sit out, write in or even vote Democratic in races involving pro-Trump Republican­s. It may require Republican­s to lose control of the House (now very plausible) and to lose control of the Senate (still unlikely). It will certainly require Trump to lose control of the presidency. In the near term, this is what victory for Republican­s will look like: strategic defeat. Recovery will only be found on the other side of loss.

It is the emergency method for Republican­s to detach themselves from Trump, create a new party identity and become worthy of winning.

In GOP losses such as the Alabama Senate race, it is not rogue Republican voters (or non-voters) who are at fault. It is the blind ideologues who gave them an impossible choice. Similarly, if Republican­s lose the House, the Senate, the presidency and (for a time) the country — and incur some policy losses in the process — Trump’s Republican opponents would not be to blame. It would be Trump and his supporters, who turned the Republican Party into a sleazy, derelict funhouse, unsafe for children, women and minorities.

A healthy, responsibl­e, appealing GOP can only be built on the ruins of this one.

Such political disloyalty to the president is now the substance of true loyalty to the Republican Party — and reason enough to welcome Sen. Jones with cheerful relief.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States