The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

Trump and the taxi king

- Byron York Columnist

On May 22, a man named Evgeny Freidman, the owner of more than 800 taxi licenses in New York City, pleaded guilty to “failure to remit to the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance $5 million in 50-cent (Metropolit­an Transporta­tion Authority) surcharges between 2012 and 2015,” according to a press release from the state attorney general.

The guilty plea topped national newscasts and was discussed for days, which is a little unusual for a case in which a fairly small-time businessma­n — even one known around New York as the “taxi king” — admitted to pocketing a local tax on cab rides.

So why was it big news? Because Trump.

“More breaking news tonight,” CNN reported May 22. “This, on President Trump’s fixer, Michael Cohen. One of Cohen’s business partners, a Russian immigrant known as the taxi king, has agreed to assist federal investigat­ors as part of a plea deal.”

The idea was that, as part of his cooperatio­n, Freidman would dish on Cohen, which would increase pressure on Cohen to dish on Trump with Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller, and the end result would be ... well, that was unspecifie­d, but it clearly involved expectatio­ns of some sort of yet-to-be-exposed wrongdoing.

Going after the taxi king in hopes of proving collusion in the 2016 presidenti­al race is a bank

shot, to say the least.

But other parts of Mueller’s investigat­ion — and certainly of the reporting on Mueller’s investigat­ion — are bank shots, too.

This month a man named Jeffrey Yohai, who at one time was married to former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s daughter, pleaded guilty to “conspiracy charges ... relating to real-estate loans on properties in New York and California,” as well as to misreprese­nting his income to obtain an American Express “Black Card,” according to the Wall Street Journal.

“Breaking news,” CNN reported on May 17. “Paul Manafort’s former son-in-law reaching a plea deal. What does this mean for Manafort and the Russia investigat­ion?”

The idea was that, as part of his cooperatio­n, Yohai would dish on Manafort, which would increase pressure on Manafort to plead guilty and dish on Trump. Another bank shot. Even the case of Manafort himself, the highest-ranking Trump campaign official to be charged in the Russia investigat­ion, is a bank shot. Manafort faces a long, multi-count indictment focusing on financial crimes he allegedly committed years before and apart from his work on the Trump campaign. The idea is to put so much pressure on Manafort with unrelated charges that he will eventually give up, plead guilty to lesser offenses, and dish on Trump.

That is what Rick Gates, Manafort’s partner and the Trump campaign’s deputy manager, has already done: plead guilty to crimes committed years before and apart from his work

on the Trump campaign. The two other campaign figures who have pleaded guilty, Michael Flynn and George Papadopoul­os, both admitted lying about Trump campaign-related matters, but not to any crime involving collusion, or conspiracy, or coordinati­on, between the Trump campaign and Russia to fix the 2016 election.

Put it all together, and the impression left by the public parts of the Mueller probe is that Mueller has spent more than a year circling around the basic question of his investigat­ion — Was there collusion? — but not answering it.

The only straight, direct charges are against a group of Russians who operated a content factory in the 2016 race. They’re not expected ever to stand trial.

It should be said that all this is just the public part of the Mueller investigat­ion. He might have some blockbuste­r charges in the works that no one outside his office knows about. Mueller has been consistent­ly ahead of the reporting.

But the fact that he has investigat­ed and charged four figures from the Trump campaign — Manafort, Gates, Flynn and Papadopoul­os — and not charged any with crimes involving collusion appears to be significan­t. If there were in fact a Trump-Russia collusion scheme, they would likely have been involved. If not them, who?

So now prosecutor­s, and the press, are looking farther and farther afield — to the taxi king and beyond — in hopes of uncovering the collusion conspiracy they believe exists but so far can’t find.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States