The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

Stewart bolts after indifferen­t tenure

- Matt DeGeorge Columnist

When Earnie Stewart was introduced to the masses in Philadelph­ia in December 2015, the sound in the press room at Talen Energy Stadium wasn’t so much that of suited front-office types applauding as of a page being turned.

This was a new era. Stewart would reign over soccer operations in a newly minted title. If a personnel decision was made, Stewart had the final voice in the process. If a player arrived or departed, he did so with Stewart’s imprimatur. Whether he was judge or jury, Stewart would always determine when court was dismissed.

But as Stewart bids farewell to Philadelph­ia, introduced as the general manager of the U.S. men’s national team Wednesday, a similar haze remains unbroken. After two and a half seasons of Stewart, how to quantify his accomplish­ments in Chester is a conundrum, and the frustratio­n of the process speaks volumes of the on-field indifferen­ce of his tenure.

The Union that Stewart leaves behind for the greener pastures of U.S. Soccer is better off than when he arrived, fresh off a successful stint with Dutch club AZ Alkmaar. But how much of that is attributab­le to the 49-year-old is debatable, in precisely the equivocal way that he had sought to dispel.

On the field, results haven’t met expectatio­ns. The Union of 2016 skidded into the playoffs on an eight-game winless run and were banished in a Wild Card game in Toronto. The next year, the Union posted an identical record and finished eighth. They sit seventh as we approach the midpoint of 2018. They’ve yet to escape the purgatoria­l grasp of the East’s red line, and the cabinet remains bare of playoff wins, much less trophies.

Yet Stewart would argue, often to the infuriatio­n of the fan base that endured four consecutiv­e playoff-free seasons before his arrival, that such changes don’t happen overnight. That leaves his legacy in the intangible and out of his control. But even on those issues, allocating credit solely to Stewart is fraught.

The Union’s roster, though not competitiv­e with the league’s opulent titans, has improved. But the two main facets of that growth are beyond Stewart’s purview. Bethlehem Steel, which has aided developmen­t of young players on the fringe of the lineup with regular USL minutes, was inaugurate­d by Nick Sakiewicz in the dying days of his regime. YSC Academy, which has churned out five Homegrowns playing regularly, is the brainchild of Richie Graham, who has pumped his blood, sweat and at least eight figures of investment capital into it. First-team regulars like Auston Trusty have played under the Union umbrella for nearly a decade; it’s difficult to discern the sole fingerprin­ts of Stewart in their success.

Then there’s the first team, where Stewart was supposed to have the biggest impact. His Moneyball philosophy and European rolodex promised to

help the Union consistent­ly punch above its financial weight. But he’s whiffed more often than not. The list has been enumerated before — Anderson, Roland Alberg, Giliano Wijnaldum, Jay Simpson, David Accam — acquisitio­ns that have not delivered the needed return within a spendthrif­t ethos to level the fiscal difference with the top tier.

Stewart doesn’t pass any of these criteria with flying colors, instead settling for shades of gray. Yes, the apparatus that developed Derrick Jones, Trusty and Anthony Fontana was in place before him. But Stewart both prioritize­d youth minutes to help them take the final steps to becoming regulars and fostered an identity that made them eschew college and embark on an start as pros, which wasn’t always the case prior (cough, Zack Steffen, cough). At the very least, Stewart accelerate­d their ascent. Stewart didn’t land a blockbuste­r signing. But his most promising, Borek Dockal, is only 13 games in. Other signings, like Alejandro Bedoya, were in motion before his arrival.

The Union haven’t won a playoff game because they haven’t matched the pace of growth in the East. But from the chaos of the previous administra­tion, the Union have consistent­ly built in absolute terms year on year. He’s poured the foundation, goes the cliché, and now it’s up to the remaining brain trust to find someone to build the house.

Where Stewart doesn’t pass quite so comfortabl­y is on fan sentiment. The Union that he inherited occupied a wide open space in the Philadelph­ia sporting landscape. The Phillies were about to bottom out in their rebuild, ditto the Process-ing Sixers. The Flyers were in aging-rostered purgatory, and the Eagles were, if you can cast your mind back that far, not yet Super Bowl champs. The Union, on the back of two straight Open Cup final berths, had the chance to seize the open air of the summer landscape. They failed, left behind by fellow Philly franchises building exciting and youthful identities. As crowds have dwindled into the lower quartile of MLS, the Union are no closer to relevance at home than league-wide. Against that

stagnancy, Stewart doesn’t leave Chester with the graduation season pomp and circumstan­ce, of Philly seeing one of its own rising up the ranks, but a more aloof parting.

Where Stewart has inarguably excelled — and where U.S. soccer perhaps needs the most help — was in articulati­ng guidelines. From designated players to equipment managers, everyone with the Union has come to understand their roles more fully. Stewart fleshed out what the Union wanted to be and how they wanted to play. Elucidatin­g those tenets streamline­d decision-making, and while the execution has often been lacking, the design he bequeaths isn’t.

As Stewart is fond of saying, though, the results tell an unforgivin­g tale. The standings leave no room for buzzwords, for curve-grading, for caveats. On that account, the Union haven’t fulfilled the optimism Stewart instilled three years ago. One day, the team might, and credit could be retroactiv­ely tagged to Stewart’s legacy. But that depends on who replaces him, on the players that follow the ones Stewart signed, maybe even on the coach that eventually succeeds Jim Curtin, who Stewart so championed through good times and bad.

That uncertaint­y is both acclaim and indictment of Stewart’s tenue.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States