Watergate lessons from the History Channel
The new History Channel documentary on the Watergate scandal may not be great art, but it is timely as heck. It describes (and, unfortunately, re-enacts) the downward spiral of Richard Nixon’s administration into paranoia, criminal conspiracy, self-delusion and ruin.
Ken Burns it is not. But the problem is not the actors; it is the script. When Nixon’s words are placed in someone else’s mouth, they seem like a bad writer’s version of a political villain. “I want it implemented on a thievery basis,” Nixon says. And: “We are going to use any means.” And: “We have not used the power in this first four years. … We haven’t used the Bureau and we haven’t used the Justice Department. But things are going to change now.”
It is hard to repeat such dialogue without rubbing your hands together and letting out a cackle. But the Trump era offers many such examples of life imitating melodrama.
The examples pile up. Remember that Trump — knowing that his first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, had lied to the FBI — allegedly asked then-director of the FBI, James Comey, not to prosecute Flynn. When Comey resisted, Trump fired him. Then the president asked Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats and National Security Agency Director Admiral Michael Rogers to publicly affirm there was no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. (They, to their credit, did not comply.)
All this is Nixonian by any measure. Both Trump and Nixon share the same ideology of power — a belief that, since their enemies are ruthless, they must be more ruthless still. Both men share an obsession with hidden enemies that actually produces more hidden enemies. And both men share a view of the executive branch involving the total subservience of every public official who reports to the president.
The last point is perhaps the most significant. America has generally been blessed by having a strong executive branch, which has been a necessary source of adaptation and leadership. In the normal course of events, however, a president appoints officials who will join him in the faithful application of the law and the defense of the Constitution. The goal is not to appoint men and women willing to serve him outside those boundaries. So, just as it is not appropriate for Trump to order his director of national intelligence to be his personal valet at the White House, it is not appropriate to ask his DNI to provide political cover during an ongoing FBI investigation.
The integrity of our political system has always depended on principled public servants willing to say “no” to great power. During the Watergate scandal, Judge John Sirica did it. When Nixon fired the special prosecutor, Attorney General Elliot Richardson and his deputy William Ruckelshaus resigned. Ultimately, the health of our republic depends, not only on political systems, but on flawed people who reach the limit of accommodation.
There are many reasons for pessimism about our fractured politics — including the general cowardice of elected Republicans in the face of presidential corruption and abuse of power. But will special counsel Robert Mueller — who spent a decade building the reputation and independence of the FBI — really be silenced or outwitted by the clownish caricature of Nixon who occupies the Oval Office and issues a fusillade of smoking guns? Not likely.
Rosenstein has managed to give Mueller the time to put down on paper the strongest case against a president without ethics or honor. And it is beyond Trump’s power to erase.