The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

The survival of the witless

- Michael Gerson Columnist

They wander the halls of public buildings and haunt receptions like the ghosts of the GOP past — the cohort of Republican senators and House members who will be leaving office with the arrival of the new Congress. Some chose retirement because they did not want to do what is necessary to keep office in Donald Trump’s party. Others were forcibly retired by the Democratic midterm wave.

The class of departing Republican­s includes a few who won’t be missed.

But many of the House losses came in suburban districts that required outreach beyond the Trump-intoxicate­d base. Nationally, Democrats won about 70 percent of votes in suburban House districts.

This means the grim political reaper came for some of the most reasonable elements of the party. This process is the reverse of natural selection — call it the survival of the witless.

Under typical circumstan­ces, departing Republican officehold­ers would be obvious recruits for administra­tion jobs. Is there any doubt that retiring Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., would have been a prime candidate for secretary of state in a more normal GOP administra­tion? Others would be natural fits for the lesser Cabinet jobs. But as Trump’s party purifies itself, true talent becomes a waste product.

In an incomplete, unrepresen­tative survey, conducted at think tank events and in buffet lines, departing members have told me a few things.

They uniformly wonder why a president presiding over a 4 percent unemployme­nt rate made immigratio­n — actually, brown people invading the country who needed to be stopped by a deployment of the U.S. military — the substance of his midterm appeal.

Departing GOP members also wonder why Trump nationaliz­ed a midterm election that could have been better fought on local issues and conditions.

More than two-thirds of Americans cast their midterm votes to send a message about the president, either positive or negative — a recent record. It was once said of Teddy Roosevelt that he wanted to be “the bride at every wedding.” Trump seems compelled to be bride, groom, minister, wedding singer and drunken guy giving the off-color champagne toast.

And departing members report that the most active Republican partisans in their state believe that there is nothing — absolutely nothing — wrong with a political party that lost 40 House seats in a time of relative peace and unpreceden­ted prosperity. If anything, one soon-to-be-former member told me, the Republican base believes its party lost ground because it wasn’t true enough to Trump’s agenda.

So where does this leave American politics headed into the 2020 presidenti­al election? Trump’s party — predominan­tly based in rural, small-town and smaller city America, and disproport­ionately older, male, less educated and white — is genuinely enthusiast­ic about its disruptive leader. Urban and (increasing­ly) suburban Americans — disproport­ionately younger, female, more educated and multicultu­ral — are finally getting the picture that they are Trumpism’s foils.

This leaves a few of us entirely homeless in American politics. If you had asked me 10 years ago, when I left government, if the Republican Party could be won and rallied with George Wallace’s campaign themes, I would have thought you ridiculous. Now it is my naivete that deserves ridicule.

Trump is a politician famous for following his “gut” to some odd and sketchy places. But the political question of the 2020 presidenti­al election is quite practical: Can Trump keep Michigan, Wisconsin or Pennsylvan­ia (he doesn’t need them all) while avoiding any defections in Sunbelt states such as Arizona?

The answer: With a flawed enough Democratic candidate, yes he can. If Democratic primary voters view Trump’s vulnerabil­ity as an opportunit­y to get all the ideologica­l goodies they’ve ever wanted, rather than a rare chance to expand their coalition to moderate voters, they would again oppose a weak candidate with a weaker one.

And they would re-elect the least fit president in American history.

Given the social and demographi­c trends of the country, it will soon be impossible to win a presidenti­al election with an ethno-nationalis­t appeal. But we aren’t there yet.

Meanwhile, Trump commits political vampirism — sucking the last remaining life from a dying coalition.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States