The Reporter (Lansdale, PA)

No window ‘fast track’ for child sex abuse suit

- By Mark Scolforo and Marc Levy

HARRISBURG, PA. >> Majority Republican­s in the state Senate said Monday they will not employ a rarely used emergency process to amend the Pennsylvan­ia Constituti­on to give victims of child sexual abuse a two-year window in which to file civil lawsuits, possibly delaying a final vote on the window until 2023.

The collapse of the emergency amendment process followed years of battles in the Legislatur­e, prompted by investigat­ions into child sexual abuse allegation­s inside Pennsylvan­ia’s Roman Catholic diocese.

Senate Majority Leader Kim Ward said in a statement that the matter “does not meet the emergency status criteria and does not correct the failure by the Wolf Administra­tion as it still does not properly vet this matter with the public.”

Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf’s Department of State failed to make the required public advertisem­ents last year of a convention­al constituti­onal amendment, leaving lawmakers a choice between starting the process over or using the emergency amendment process.

Ward said lawmakers will start over.

“The derelictio­n of duty

by the Wolf administra­tion has forced the Pennsylvan­ia Senate to reset the clock on the constituti­onal amendment,” said Ward, R-Westmorela­nd. “The Pennsylvan­ia Senate will act in the same manner as it has previously and in accordance with the Commonweal­th’s constituti­on and will seek to pass another constituti­onal amendment.”

The emergency amendment proposal became an option after Wolf’s administra­tion revealed six weeks ago it had committed a massive mistake and failed to arrange the mandatory advertisem­ent.

That scuttled plans to approve a proposed state constituti­onal amendment allowing lawsuits over decades-old claims to appear on the May 18 primary ballot for voters to consider.

Ward’s statement emerged in the days after backers acknowledg­ed that support might be lacking for an emergency amendment.

Rep. Mark Rozzi, DBerks, who has championed the two-year lawsuit window, said he was working on a plan to provide it through regular legislatio­n, while the slower convention­al constituti­onal amendment process continues.

“It’s disappoint­ing for the victims, for sure,” said Rozzi, who has spoken publicly about his own abuse at the hands of a parish priest.

The double track approach of a normal bill and an amendment could start quickly, he said.

“I think it’s a very viable option,” Rozzi said, “at least to get something out of the House that way.”

The proposed constituti­onal amendment would give now-adult victims of childhood sexual abuse a two-year reprieve — a socalled window — from time limits in state law that otherwise bar them from suing perpetrato­rs or institutio­ns that may have covered it up.

Many lost the right to sue when they turned 18 or were young adults, depending on state law at the time. Under the proposed amendment, they would have two years to sue over their alleged abuse, no matter how long ago it occurred.

The convention­al process of amending the state constituti­on had made it halfway through the required majority approval by both chambers in two consecutiv­e two-year sessions. Voters have the final say in a referendum, but a referendum on the issue cannot happen now before 2023 without an emergency amendment.

Rather than restart the lengthy procedure, supporters wanted to use the emergency amendment process that has only been employed three times, all involving flooding or storms in the 1970s, according to the Department of State.

Some lawmakers opposed using the emergency process for the child sexual abuse lawsuit window, arguing it would set a bad precedent and the facts did not warrant it.

The Wolf administra­tion’s mishandlin­g of the previous amendment caused Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar to resign early last month. She has described it as an administra­tive error.

Democratic lawmakers, Attorney General Josh Shapiro and Wolf had supported creating a two-year window by carving it into state law.

Senate Republican­s, however, blocked that avenue in 2018, amid opposition from Roman Catholic bishops and the for-profit insurers, and said that they would instead support a constituti­onal amendment.

Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, accused Republican­s of being “willing to delay justice over a clerical mistake” and argued that delaying justice for victims does, indeed, amount to an emergency.

Costa echoed Rozzi in advocating anew for opening a two-year window by changing the law, and objected to Ward’s argument that an emergency constituti­onal amendment had not been adequately vetted with the public.

The proposed constituti­onal amendment “had passed with majority support in two consecutiv­e sessions. It has been vetted. We have approved it. We must act to get this on the ballot in May — as it was intended, or immediatel­y signed into law,” Costa said in a statement.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States