The Reporter (Vacaville)

Youthful photos of an ex now upset wife

-

DEAR AMY >> Many years ago, I was married to “Annie” for about 10 years. Our divorce was amicable, and since we had no children, we have not had any contact since our divorce.

A couple of years after my divorce I met and married “Bea.” We've now been married for over 30 years.

I have an album of photograph­s. This album consists of childhood photos, photos of my parents, siblings, and me through high school and college. The album includes three photos of Annie — nothing suggestive or racy — these are just reminders of the good times from my youth.

Bea strenuousl­y objects to me keeping the photos of Annie and wants me to destroy them, while I think that they are harmless souvenirs of my life, and that destroying them is an irrational attempt to erase the past.

Am I nuts?

— Charlie

DEAR CHARLIE >> You sound like a perfectly normal person with a perfectly normal past.

I have a knee-jerk and negative reaction to the idea of destroying photos. As we move into an almost thoroughly digital age, these material objects are visceral reminders that we exist in the world, in many splendidly awkward settings and posed alongside people we no longer know. And yet — there we are!

At the risk of angering your wife, it would be thoughtful for you to scan or copy these photos and send copies to “Annie.” (Do not post them on social media.) I would think that anyone would enjoy a tangible reminder of their much-younger self.

It might help you to lean in toward your wife's reaction if you understand that behind her anger might be regret that she wasn't ever young alongside you.

Because you two met later, she missed a period sharing your life that might always be a source of some sadness and regret for her.

Meet her with affection and understand­ing for the youthful period you didn't get to share, but gratitude for the adulthood you've been granted together.

DEAR AMY >> Your answer to “Upset Dad” was astounding­ly, bewilderin­gly wrong.

“Dad” mentions that his brothers are childless, as though this justifies his expectatio­n that they should step in to provide regular free childcare.

Other peoples worlds do not revolve around one's children!

— Disappoint­ed in YOU

DEAR DISAPPOINT­ED >>

“Upset Dad's” son has special needs. According to his question, his brothers seemed unsure of how to be good uncles to their nephew.

He was appealing to his brothers not for childcare, but for connection.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States