The Riverside Press-Enterprise

Edison can avoid burying power lines

Norco seeks legislativ­e help as regulator calls above-ground fire risks ‘less than significan­t’

- By Brooke Staggs bstaggs@scng.com

State utility regulators on Thursday rejected Norco’s request to make Southern California Edison bury transmissi­on lines for a long-awaited Riverside power project that will run along the Santa Ana River.

Norco is now eyeing a legislativ­e fix. City manager Lori Sassoon said it’s working with Assemblyma­n

Bill Essayli, R-riverside, to introduce a bill that would suspend the power project until an updated environmen­tal study is completed.

If that bill isn’t approved, the unanimous decision by the California Public Utilities Commission likely closes the door on the local chapter of a complicate­d debate that’s playing out in California, as a broad push to locate power lines below ground due to increasing wildfire risks clashes with rising electricit­y rates and a need to quickly add capacity to the state’s power grid.

The state approved Riverside’s $521 million transmissi­on project four years ago to give the city a second connection to the regional electric grid. That plan includes adding steel poles and towers that would soar up to 180 feet as lines cut through the Hidden Valley Nature Center, where shorter abovegroun­d power infrastruc­ture already exists.

In October, Norco asked the commission to reconsider that decision, noting in its petition that wildfire risks and other conditions have changed in recent years. The city and its supporters, including a bipartisan group of elected officials, argued that those changes justify the added cost and work involved with putting the planned transmissi­on lines undergroun­d.

“Since March of 2021, there has been a significan­t increase in the number of wildland fires within and around the city of Norco,” Rep. Ken Calvert, R-corona, told commission­ers on a call during the commission meeting. “Installing new overhead projection for power transmissi­on lines brings additional fire risks and does not make any sense for this fire-prone area.”

However, after the commission’s 3-0 vote to reject Norco’s petition, member Karen Douglas said the conditions Calvert and others have raised were already taken into considerat­ion during environmen­tal reviews and prior votes on the Riverside Transmissi­on Reliabilit­y Project.

“We take our role in addressing the risk of utility-involved wildfire seriously,” Douglas said. And given requiremen­ts for Edi

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States