The Saratogian (Saratoga, NY)

Dems’ memo may be released

Trump has until end of the week to decide if document can be released to public

- By Mary Clare Jalonick, Chad Day and Jonathan Lemire

WASHINGTON » President Donald Trump will decide whether the public will be allowed to read a memo written by House Democrats on its Russia probe. He has until the end of the week to decide whether to allow its release.

White House chief of staff John Kelly told reporters Tuesday afternoon that Trump hadn’t read the memo yet because Kelly said he had just given the president the document and that it was fairly lengthy.

Trump last week declassifi­ed a document written by the committee’s Republican majority that

criticized methods the FBI used to obtain a surveillan­ce warrant on a onetime Trump campaign associate.

The Democratic memo, intended as a counter to the GOP document, further diverted the committee this week from its investigat­ion into Russian meddling and possible connection­s between Russia and Trump’s presidenti­al campaign.

The House panel voted unanimousl­y Monday to release the Democratic memo, sending it to the White House for a legal and national security review. White House officials said they received the memo Monday evening, and press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the administra­tion “will follow the same process and procedure” it did with the Republican document — meaning Trump has five days to decide whether to allow the memo’s publicatio­n.

Though a final determinat­ion has not been reached, the memo is likely to be returned to the House this week for release. After initial review, the officials said, the Democratic memo is likely to require some redactions.

Separate investigat­ions are underway by the Senate intelligen­ce committee and special counsel Robert Mueller, whose team is scheduled to interview former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon next week.

The Mueller interview was confirmed by two people familiar with it. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about details of the interview.

Bannon is expected to face questions about key events during his time in the White House including Trump’s firings of former National Security adviser Michael Flynn and former FBI Director James Comey.

Also Tuesday, the House intelligen­ce committee gave Bannon another week to negotiate the terms of a closed-door interview as the White House has put limits on what he can tell Congress. Bannon was under subpoena to appear Tuesday as part of the panel’s Russia probe, but Republican­s pushed the deadline to next week as talks about the terms of his interview continued.

California Rep. Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the intelligen­ce panel, said Bannon’s lawyer has told the committee that the White House will only permit him to answer 14 “yes” or “no” questions. He said Bannon is barred by the White House from talking about matters during the presidenti­al transition, his time at the White House and communicat­ions with President Donald Trump since he left in August.

Schiff said the panel is in rare bipartisan agreement that the terms offered are unacceptab­le.

“Should Bannon maintain his refusal to return and testify fully to all questions, the committee should begin contempt proceeding­s to compel his testimony,” Schiff said.

Despite unity on the Bannon interview, partisan tensions continued to run high on the committee as lawmakers issued their dueling memos.

Schiff and other Democrats have raised questions about whether the committee chairman, Republican Rep. Devin Nunes of California, coordinate­d with the White House in drafting the GOP memo. After the document’s release last week, the president quickly seized on it to vent his grievances against the nation’s premier law enforcemen­t agencies.

“The goal here is to undermine the FBI, discredit the FBI, discredit the Mueller investigat­ion, do the president’s bidding,” Schiff said, adding that he thinks “it’s very possible” that Nunes’ staff worked with the White House.

Nunes was asked during a Jan. 29 committee meeting whether he had coordinate­d the memo with the White House. “As far as I know, no,” he responded. He refused to answer when asked whether his congressio­nal staff members had communicat­ed with the White House. He had previously apologized for sharing with the White House secret intelligen­ce intercepts related to an investigat­ion of Russian election interferen­ce before talking to committee members.

The Republican memo released last Friday alleges misconduct by the FBI and the Justice Department in obtaining a warrant under the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act to monitor former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page. Specifical­ly, the memo takes aim at the FBI’s use of informatio­n from former British spy Christophe­r Steele, who compiled a dossier containing allegation­s of ties between Trump, his associates and Russia.

The GOP memo’s central allegation is that agents and prosecutor­s, in applying in October 2016 to monitor Page’s communicat­ions, failed to tell a judge that Steele’s opposition research was funded in part by Hillary Clinton’s presidenti­al campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

 ?? ALEX BRANDON — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Committee on Intelligen­ce, speaks Monday during a media availabili­ty after a closed-door meeting of the House Intelligen­ce Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington.
ALEX BRANDON — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., ranking member of the House Committee on Intelligen­ce, speaks Monday during a media availabili­ty after a closed-door meeting of the House Intelligen­ce Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington.
 ?? EVAN VUCCI — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? President Donald Trump waves as he participat­es in a tour of Sheffer Corporatio­n to promote his tax policy Monday in Cincinnati.
EVAN VUCCI — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS President Donald Trump waves as he participat­es in a tour of Sheffer Corporatio­n to promote his tax policy Monday in Cincinnati.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States