FIFA panel adds video review to soccer laws
ZURICH » In one of the most fundamental changes ever to soccer’s 155-year-old rules, FIFA approved video review on Saturday and cleared the way to use it at the World Cup in June.
World soccer’s panel overseeing the laws of the game voted to add video assistant referees (VAR) despite mixed results from trials in top-level games.
The panel, known as IFAB, voted unanimously to begin updating the game’s written rules to include VAR and let competition organizers ask to adopt it — with FIFA next in line this month.
The decision “represents a new era for football with video assistance for referees helping to increase integrity and fairness in the game,” IFAB said in a statement.
FIFA must take a further decision on using VAR at the World Cup in Russia, which kicks off June 14.
That should be on March 16 when the FIFA Council chaired by President Gianni Infantino meets in Bogota, Colombia.
Infantino has long said World Cup referees must get high-tech help to review key decisions at the 64-game tournament.
Video review can overturn “clear and obvious errors” and “serious missed incidents” by match officials involving goals, penalty awards, red cards, and mistaken identity.
Still, Infantino also acknowledged on Saturday the VAR system “is not perfect.” In 18 months of trials worldwide, reviews have been slower than promised and communication is often unclear in the stadium.
“VAR at the World Cup will certainly help to have a fairer World Cup,” Infantino said at a news conference after the IFAB meeting. “If there is a big mistake, it will be corrected.”
Infantino said FIFA must have “the ambition to get close to perfection” even if some coaches, players and fans were not yet convinced by video review.
VAR has often created confusion in the first full season of live trials which now include more than 1,000 games worldwide. Top-tier competitions which opted to use it include Germany’s Bundesliga and Italy’s
Serie A.
Several games at the 2017 Confederations Cup, FIFA’s World Cup warm-up tournament in Russia, also left many in the stadium unsure what match officials were doing. Communication was unclear during reviews lasting minutes instead of a handful of seconds, which was the target suggested in 2016 when the protocol for using VAR was shaped and trials began.
“We have to speed up reviews,” the CEO of England’s Football Association, Martin Glenn, acknowledged after taking part in the decision. “Communications to the crowd has to be better. People in the crowd aren’t sure what is happening.” UEFA has already ruled out using VAR in the Champions League next season, and the English Premier League is also waiting to see if the system can prove itself essential.
Still, the International Football Association Board’s approval was expected on Saturday because FIFA controls four of the eight votes. The four British soccer associations, which created IFAB in 1886, have one vote each, and six are needed to approve an idea.
FIFA’s historical reluctance to embrace technological help for referees changed at the 2010 World Cup, after an England goal was not given despite Frank Lampard’s shot clearly crossing the German goal-line. Germany went on to win the last 16 game 4-1.
At the 2014 World Cup, FIFA deployed goal-line technology. Referees were alerted with a simple yesno signal to their watches after multiple camera angles judged if the ball crossed the line. Goalline systems are used at UEFA’s European Championship and in the Premier League.
The potential use of video review was first announced on the eve of the World Cup in Brazil.
FIFA’s then-president, Sepp Blatter, surprised IFAB officials in Sao Paulo by suggesting coaches could call on video replays to challenge some refereeing decisions.
The landmark decision leaves much yet to be finalized, such as wording for the amended rules and an exact protocol for operating the system including how to communicate to fans using giant screens inside stadiums.
FIFA must also choose technology providers with around 15 involved in trials and workshops at Zurich. It is also seeking a sponsor for video review at the World Cup.
In Russia, FIFA plans to use a central command center for VAR teams working away from stadiums to communicate with referees — a system adopted by American professional sports leagues.
Also on Saturday, the IFAB panel used evidence from two years of trials to approve teams using a fourth substitute during the 30 minutes of extra time in knockout games. Teams can even use all four replacements in the extra periods if no changes were made in regulation time. prove. Both are 24. Both were drafted in the first round by other teams and came to the Braves as prospects in trades.
They both had mixed results in their first full seasons (Swanson played in 38 games in 2016), but they will be expected to do more this season.
“We don’t feel like any of those guys are finished products yet,” manager Brian Snitker said. “Dansby was coming in after the really good end of the season before, and ... this is a tough league.
“You just don’t come in and conquer it. There’s been a lot of Hall of Famers that had rough goes at the beginning. You’re going to have setbacks in this game; it’s going to beat you over the head probably more times than not. And you have to learn from it and survive it.”
Swanson, the No. 1 overall pick by the Arizona Diamondbacks in the 2015 draft, was sent to TripleA in July after struggling.
“Obviously that’s not how you planned for it to go, but there’s always a bigger plan to trust,” he said. “I was willing to take that in stride and be better from it. I don’t think I ever truly lost confidence in myself. It was just more of like re-evaluating, like finding it again.”
Swanson, who came to the Braves along with Ender Inciarte and Aaron Blair in the trade for Shelby Miller in December 2015, hit .213 before his 11-game demotion and .268 when he came back. He said the daily grind was an experience that required adjustments.
“The most I ever played in college was 72 games in a year,” he said, “and now it’s 162, you play every day. Physically it’s tough, but mentally it can be tough too, if you let it.”
Newcomb, the 15th overall pick by the Los Angeles Angels in 2014, came to the Braves a month before Swanson in the Andrelton Simmons trade. He has been in the Braves’ rotation since his major league debut on June 10 last year. However his spot for 2018 is not secure yet like those of Julio Teheran, Mike Foltynewicz and Brandon McCarthy.
“I look at it like that was my spot last year. Coming into this spring it’s my spot to lose actually, so if someone’s trying to take it from me, I’ve just got to go out there and do what I’ve got to do,” Newcomb said.
With veterans R.A. Dickey, Bartolo Colon and Jaime Garcia in the rotation last spring, it was understood that Newcomb would start in Triple-A.
“This rotation is definitely different, and it keeps the intensity level up,” he said. “As far as the day-to-day stuff, I feel pretty good about it. I feel comfortable being around most of these guys. It makes the adjustments to spring training easier.”
Newcomb has three weeks to work on getting the walks down while increasing his strikeouts.
“He’s getting to know himself better. A lot of it is confidence,” Snitker said. “They want to get strike one, and when you don’t go strike one, then they start trying to throw strikes and it becomes counterproductive. He’s not the finished product, but he’s far better today than he was a year ago today, put it that way.”