The Saratogian (Saratoga, NY)

If you didn’t vote for Hillary, this is your fault

- Cynthia Tucker Email Cynthia Tucker at cynthia@cynthiatuc­ker.com.

It matters less, now, if President Donald J. Trump serves only one term. It matters less if he is impeached. It matters less if Robert Mueller indicts him for colluding with a foreign power.

With the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy from the U.S. Supreme Court, Trump is a hairbreadt­h away from sealing his legacy as one of the most influentia­l (if petty, crude, divisive, corrupt and antidemocr­atic) presidents in American history.

It is hard to overestima­te the magnitude of this developmen­t. Trump has promised to appoint another hardcore conservati­ve, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and his minions will roll right over Senate Democrats to confirm him (or her). That jurist will likely be in his or her 40s or 50s and serve for decades.

That strongly suggests that for the rest of my life -- and through a considerab­le part of my child’s adult life -- the nation’s highest court will be a bastion of ultra-right doctrine, hostile to progressiv­e causes of all sorts. That court will likely kill off reproducti­ve rights, starve unions, look askance at affirmativ­e action, eviscerate voting rights and abuse criminal defendants. It will coddle violent police officers, kowtow to corporatio­ns and re-write the First Amendment, bulldozing Thomas Jefferson’s famed “wall of separation between church and state.”

This is a huge victory for the forces of retrenchme­nt. Conservati­ves are much better than liberals at playing the long game, and rich political players on the right have been plotting to remake the court in their own image for decades now. Even before Kennedy’s announceme­nt (and with Kennedy’s assistance), the high court had shifted rightward. Just this summer, the court has weakened reproducti­ve rights, upheld Trump’s hateful, anti-Muslim travel ban and hammered public sector unions. It aided and abetted homophobes with a ruling that sided with a baker who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.

McConnell gambled on that shift -- and won -- when he stymied President Barack Obama’s appointmen­t of Merrick Garland. Spitting on the U.S. Constituti­on, McConnell defied precedent, mocked tradition and trammeled bi-partisansh­ip, insisting that no high court nominee should be confirmed in an election year. Senate Republican­s later embraced Trump’s nomination of Neil Gorsuch, who has become a reliable ultraconse­rvative vote.

Of course, McConnell quickly reversed himself after Kennedy’s announceme­nt, revealing that the Senate will vote on a nominee in the fall. Never mind that it’s an election year. Conservati­ves see their long-held goal of a far-right court just a step or two away, and hypocrisy is their handmaiden.

For much of my life, the Supreme Court served as a defense for oppressed minorities -- a bulwark that pushed political and civic institutio­ns to fully respect our rights as citizens. Through several decades, the highest court issued rulings that desegregat­ed public schools, upheld voting rights, sanctioned desegregat­ion of public accommodat­ions and respected affirmativ­e action. It broadened protection­s for criminal defendants. As feminism took center stage, the court upheld reproducti­ve rights.

And even as the court turned rightward after the appointmen­t of Justice Clarence Thomas, it still found occasion to grant succor to the oppressed. Kennedy’s libertaria­n streak helped to sustain that impulse. He upheld Roe v. Wade. He championed gay rights. He voted against the death penalty for juvenile offenders. But Trump’s list of potential nominees likely includes no Kennedys.

While the Trump-McConnell machine is taking all the credit for their victory, they had help from the left -- from the #NeverHilla­ry crowd. Progressiv­e activists such as actress Susan Sarandon insisted that the Democratic nominee would be no better than Trump. Green Party nominee Jill Stein drained votes away from Clinton. Young progressiv­e voters stayed away from the polls in the 2016 presidenti­al election because they weren’t “energized” by Clinton’s campaign.

They helped put Trump in office, and they will reap what they have sown. So, unfortunat­ely, will the rest of us.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States