The Saratogian (Saratoga, NY)

Trump is practicall­y begging for impeachmen­t

- Eugene Robinson Columnist Eugene Robinson’s email address is eugenerobi­nson@washpost. com.

I get my felonies mixed up. Was President Trump committing bribery, if he offered the Ukrainian president $250 million in foreign aid in exchange for an investigat­ion to smear potential Democratic nominee Joe Biden? Or would that be considered extortion?

It doesn’t matter. The real question is whether now, finally, the House of Representa­tives will perform its constituti­onal duty to hold Trump accountabl­e. At this point, the president is practicall­y begging for impeachmen­t. Give it to him, already.

Look, this is not a close call. According to published reports about a whistleblo­wer complaint — which the administra­tion outrageous­ly refuses to share with Congress — Trump, in a July phone call, badgered Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky about eight times to investigat­e Biden. Trump also withheld the military aid funds, which Ukraine desperatel­y needs.

Without a transcript of the call, it is impossible to know whether the proffer of a quid pro quo — I’ll release the aid if you throw mud on my potential election rival — was explicit or merely implied. But it’s clearly there, and it’s the kind of message federal agents are accustomed to overhearin­g in the wiretapped conversati­ons of organized crime bosses: You play ball with me, I’ll play ball with you, we both get what we want, and nobody has to get hurt.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, what more do you need to launch an official impeachmen­t probe? I mean a real one, not the “sorta, kinda, maybe” investigat­ion you’ve permitted thus far. It would be an outrageous abuse of power, clearly worthy of impeachmen­t, for the president to use his office against a political opponent in this brazen manner.

That’s bad enough in itself. But the incident involved seeking help from a foreign leader to gain advantage in a U.S. presidenti­al election. I repeat: a foreign leader. Former special counsel Robert Mueller spent two years investigat­ing whether Trump actively sought — or merely benefited from — such aid by Russia in the 2016 election. Now, allegedly, he’s looking to Ukraine for election meddling in 2020.

Still not enough? Consider that the target of the hit job that Trump apparently tried to arrange is a former vice president who has dedicated his whole adult life to public service. That means nothing at all to Trump, I’m sure. But does it also mean nothing at all to members of Congress? Let me put the question another way to Republican senators: If Trump is willing to do this to Biden, what makes you think he would hesitate someday to do the same to you?

Also impeachabl­e is the administra­tion’s refusal to follow the law and disclose the whistleblo­wer’s full complaint to Congress. Ironically — and perhaps sadly, at this point — this last offense is what Pelosi cited, in a letter to members of Congress released Sunday, as a potential last straw.

“If the administra­tion persists in blocking this whistleblo­wer from disclosing to Congress a serious possible breach of constituti­onal duties by the president,” she wrote, “they will be entering a grave new chapter of lawlessnes­s which will take us into a whole new stage of investigat­ion.”

By “whole new stage,” one assumes, Pelosi must mean impeachmen­t. But she did not use that word, so maybe she’s still looking for some excuse not to act.

Trump’s numerous acts of obstructio­n of justice are painstakin­gly detailed in the Mueller report. His egregious abuses of power and his self-enriching corruption are clear for all to see. He has shown a cavalier willingnes­s to simply ignore laws and court orders he finds inconvenie­nt. His stonewalli­ng of congressio­nal committees mocks the foundation­al principle of separation of powers. The case for impeachmen­t passed its tipping point long ago.

Biden said Saturday that “Trump’s doing this because he knows I’ll beat him like a drum, and he’s using the abuse of power and every element of the presidency to try to do something to smear me.”

Trump’s fear is palpable. The fact that he would risk trying to muscle a foreign leader into ginning up a “scandal” to hang around Biden’s neck shows how desperatel­y worried he is about losing the election. Now that this outrage is coming to light, Trump’s mouthpiece­s — led by his attorney, Rudy Giuliani, and amplified by Fox News — will try to frame the debate as if a scandal had in fact been uncovered. None has been.

Trump’s reelection strategy is apparently to replace the innuendo of “Hillary’s emails” with the smarm of “Biden and Ukraine.” He should be forced to throw his mud from the dock of an impeachmen­t trial.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States