The Saratogian (Saratoga, NY)

In hyperparti­san era, Trump’s GOP support is solid

- By Lisa Mascaro

WASHINGTON >> The more concrete the testimony in the impeachmen­t inquiry, the more solidly Republican­s are sticking with President Donald Trump.

Witness after witness in closed-door House hearings is corroborat­ing the core facts that Democrats say make a strong case against the president.

Trump pressured Ukraine, an American ally, for an investigat­ion of Joe Biden, his family and the Democrats. At the same time, the Trump administra­tion withheld military assistance for the young democracy as it confronted Russian ag

gression.

For Democrats, it adds up to a nothing short of a brazen abuse of power, a quid pro quo, swapping U.S. foreign policy and funds for personal political gain.

“I don’t think there is any justifying this president’s misconduct,” Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the Intelligen­ce Committee leading the inquiry said in an interview.

Republican­s are having none of it. Trump says it’s all just a “witch hunt,” and his supporters agree.

“The American people see this for what it is,” said Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the top Republican on the Oversight committee that’s part of the inquiry. “We see it just like the American people do, and we know — we just know — it’s wrong.”

While that investigat­ion unfolds in the basement of the Capitol, another version plays out upstairs for the public.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gaveled a vote this week to formalize the impeachmen­t inquiry, and the roll call split along predictabl­e party lines.

Not a single Republican joined Democrats to agree to investigat­e. Among the Democrats, all but two stuck together to support the inquiry.

In previous modern-era impeachmen­t proceeding­s, at least some lawmakers crossed party lines to initially provide bipartisan support for the probes of Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

But times are different now. The polarizing of the country plays out in almost all aspects of political life. Impeachmen­t proceeding­s, so far, are only reflecting that divide, in Congress as in the country at large.

More Americans approve than disapprove of the impeachmen­t inquiry, 47% to 38%, according to a new poll by The Associated Press and the NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. But it all depends on whom you ask.

The vast majority of Democrats approve of the inquiry, 68% of them strongly. Most Republican­s disapprove, 67% strongly.

Neither Trump nor Republican­s in Congress dispute the White House’s rough transcript of Trump’s July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. They say it proves the president did nothing wrong.

Standing before a portrait of George Washington after the House vote, the GOP leader, Kevin McCarthy of California, quoted Pelosi from earlier this year saying impeachmen­t was “so divisive for the country” she’d rather not pursue it unless it was completely necessary.

“What has changed?” McCarthy asked. “In all the hearings there’s nothing compelling, nothing overwhelmi­ng.” He said it’s a “sham that has been putting the country through this nightmare.”

Pelosi, in an interview Friday with Bloomberg News, said it was the phone call between Trump and the Ukrainian president that “changed everything in the public mind.”

Pelosi launched the impeachmen­t inquiry after a government whistleblo­wer recounted that Trump in the call asked Zelenskiy for “a favor.”

Trump insists the conversati­on was “perfect.”

Julian Zelizer, a professor at Princeton University, said partisansh­ip is greater than it was during Watergate and “the loyalty to party even greater.”

Thus, there isn’t likely to be any group of Republican lawmakers heading to the White House to tell the president it’s over, as happened during the impeachmen­t proceeding­s against Nixon. No march of Republican­s to say that support for Trump has dwindled and they can no longer protect him.

As for this week’s solid House support, Schiff said, “I think it’s a vote they will come to regret over time.”

“And I think when their children and grandchild­ren ask what they did to stand up to this unethical president ... they will have a hard time explaining why they chose to defend him.”

It’s specifical­ly illegal to seek or receive foreign assistance in U.S. elections. But the framers of the Constituti­on drafted the impeachmen­t clause more broadly, capturing all level of “high crimes and misdemeano­rs” that could be committed in the White House.

While the first president, Washington, was seen as a leader beyond reproach, the founders knew not all who followed might be.

There could be those who sought to use the office for personal financial gain or to rule the country more like the monarchy the founders were leaving than the democracy the U.S. was becoming. And so they tucked in the impeachmen­t provision as part of the simple, but powerful, system of checks and balances among the three branches of government.

The system depends on an agreement not only of the facts but of what the facts mean.

Zelizer, who favors impeachmen­t, says that back in 1974, “nobody would have expected Republican­s” to go to the White House as they did to pressure Nixon to resign.

But once the evidence spilled out about what Nixon said in his taped recordings, the situation became indefensib­le for Republican­s. It’s hard not to wonder if that would ever happen again.

So far in this era of intense partisansh­ip, Republican­s are rock solid in supporting Trump. House investigat­ors are now preparing to push the impeachmen­t hearings into the open.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States