The Saratogian (Saratoga, NY)

Biden faces tough choice of whether to back virus lockdowns

- By ALEXANDRA JAFFE

WASHINGTON » Joe Biden faces a decision unlike any other incoming president: whether to back a short-term national lockdown to finally arrest a raging pandemic.

For now, it’s a question the president- elect would prefer to avoid. In the week since he defeated President Donald Trump, Biden has devotedmos­t of his public remarks to encouragin­g Americans to wear a mask and view the coronaviru­s as a threat that has no regard for political ideology.

But the debate has been livelier among members of the coronaviru­s advisory board Biden

announced this week. One member, Dr. Michael Osterholm, suggested a four- to six-week lockdown with financial aid for Americans whose livelihood­s would be affected. He later walked back his remarks and was rebutted by two othermembe­rs of the panel who said a widespread lockdown shouldn’t be under considerat­ion.

That’s a sign of the tough dynamic Biden will face when he is inaugurate­d in January. He campaigned asamore responsibl­e steward of America’s public health than President Donald Trump is and has been blunt about the challenges that lie ahead for the country, warning of a “dark winter” as cases spike.

But talk of lockdowns are especially sensitive. For one, they’re nearly impossible for a president to enact onhis own, requiring bipartisan support fromstate and local officials. Butmore broadly, they’re a political flashpoint that could undermine Biden’s efforts to unify a deeply divided country.

“It would create a backlash,” said Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security who added that such a move could make the situation worse if people don’t complywith restrictio­ns. “Lockdowns can have consequenc­es that diminish the value of such an approach.”

During his first public appearance since losing the election, Trump noted on Friday that he wouldn’t support a lockdown. The president, who has yet to publicly acknowledg­e Biden’s victory, would likely reinforce that message to his loyal supporters once he’s left office.

Still, the pandemic’s toll continues to escalate.

The coronaviru­s is blamed for 10.6 million confirmed infections and almost a quarter-million deaths in the U.S., with the closely watched University of Washington model projecting nearly 439,000 dead by March 1. Deaths have climbed to about 1,000 a day on average.

New cases per day are soaring, shattering records over and over and reaching an all-time high on Thursday of over 153,000.

Several states are beginning to bring back some of the restrictio­ns first imposed during the spring. But leaders in much of the country are proceeding with caution, aware that Americans are already fatigued by virus-related disruption­s.

Indeed, after Osterholm made his comments, a number of Biden’s task force members went out to publicly disavow lockdown possibilit­ies. Dr. VivekMurth­y, the former U. S. surgeon general who’s serving as one of the co- chairs on Biden’s coronaviru­s advisory board, said the group is looking at a “series of restrictio­ns that we dial up or down” based on the severity of the virus in a given region.

“We’re not in a place where we’re saying shut the whole country down. We’ve got to be more targeted,” Murthy said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” “If we don’t do that, what you’re going to find is that people will become even more fatigued. Schools won’t be open to children and the economy will be hit harder, so we’ve got to follow science, but we’ve also got to be more precise.”

Speaking on CNBC, Dr. Celine Grounder, an infectious­disease specialist at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine and another task force member, said that, “as a group, really the consensus is that we need amore nuanced approach.”

“We can be much more targeted geographic­ally. We can also be more targeted in terms of what we close,” she said.

During the campaign, Bidenpledg­ed tomake testing free and widely available; to hire thousands of health workers to help implement contact tracing programs; and to instruct the Centers forDisease Control and Prevention to provide clear, expert-informed guidelines to businesses, schools and local officials on reopening in regions where they’ve closed.

To prepare for possible surges in cases, he’d prepare Department of Defense resources to provide medical facility capacity, logistical support and doctors and othermedic­al personnel if necessary. Biden would also use the Defense Production Act to ramp up production of masks, face shields and other personal protective equipment to help alleviate shortages at hospitals.

But Biden himself fueled some of the confusion about his stance on lockdowns during the campaign. He initially told ABC he would “listen to the scientists” if they advised him to shut down the country, and then took a more nuanced position.

“There’s going to be no need, inmy view, to be able to shut down the whole economy,” he said at a town hall in September.

Even if a nationwide lockdown made sense, polling shows that Americans’ appetite for a closure waning. Gallup found that only 49% of Americans said they’d be “very likely” to comply with a monthlong stay-athome order because of an outbreak of the virus. A full third said they’d be very or somewhat unlikely to comply with such an order.

Kathleen Sebelius, who was the health and human services secretary during the Obama administra­tion, said Biden would be wise to keep his options open for now, especially as Trump criticizes lockdowns.

“It’s a very dicey topic” politicall­y, she said. “I think wisely, the president- elect doesn’t want to get into a debatewith the sitting president about some kind of mandate that he has no authority to implement.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States