The Saratogian (Saratoga, NY)

Joe Biden’s hundred days at the kitchen table

- EJ Dionne E.J. Dionne is on Twitter: @ EJDionne.

The political core of Bidenism rests on his answers to two questions: What accounted for the setbacks experience­d by recent Democratic presidenci­es? And how can his party ease the discontent­s that led to the rise of Donald Trump?

When President Biden addressed Congress on Wednesday to mark his first 100 days in office, the driving priorities of his administra­tion were clear: the essential task of ending the pandemic, ambitious public investment to drive robust, long-term economic growth and aggressive efforts to reverse 40 years of expanding inequality.

In retrospect, it’s obvious that the Democrats’ big midterm defeats under Bill Clinton in 1994 and Barack Obama in 2010 were caused in significan­t part by sluggish economic recoveries.

As a result, Biden has taken no chances: He pressed relentless­ly for his $1.9 trillion economic rescue bill, and continues to advance infrastruc­ture investment­s and other programs to speed growth and lift incomes. He will pursue these plans with Republican­s if possible and, more likely, without them if necessary.

Similarly, Biden has touted his climate plan at least as much for its job-creating potential as for its environmen­tal benefits, pushing back against conservati­ves who have long cast action against climate change as a drag on the economy.

A pain-before-gain policy on climate proved politicall­y deadly when House Democrats passed their elegant but complicate­d cap-and-trade bill in 2009 to put a price on carbon.

Cap-and-trade or a carbon tax are rational, direct responses to the problem, but neither deals with the fears of workers in regions where the coal, oil and natural gas industries have long supported well-paying livelihood­s. Biden’s priority is to make clear that he gets these worries, and the United Mine Workers of America union’s endorsemen­t last week of “a true energy transition” suggests his approach is resonating in unexpected places.

The shaping of Biden’s climate agenda reveals the contours of his larger effort to drive a wedge into the Trump constituen­cy. A majority of Trump’s loyalists - the most fervent Republican­s, ardent immigratio­n foes, hard cultural conservati­ves, gun rights zealots, racial backlash voters - will never be available to Biden or the Democrats.

But Biden is banking on his ability to use populist economics (relief checks, upward pressure on wages, a “Buy America” campaign to bring home more manufactur­ing work, confining tax increases to corporatio­ns and those earning more than $400,000 annually) to win back Trump voters whose dissatisfa­ctions are primarily economic.

Biden’s proposals have thus far won support in the polls from about a third of Republican­s and a substantia­l majority of lower-income Republican­s (in the case of the relief act). Their response has allowed Biden to challenge the traditiona­l definition­s of bipartisan­ship - House and Senate Republican votes for his bills - that hamstrung his predecesso­rs.

Instead, Biden argues that what he is doing is good for many Republican voters, and that a significan­t share of them agrees.

As a result, Biden has contained hostility to his administra­tion and left Republican­s with few easy lines of attack. In polls conducted this month by Reuters/Ipsos, Economist/YouGov and Politico/Morning Consult, Biden’s approval rating averaged 54%. But perhaps more revealing, his disapprova­l rating averaged just under 40%.

In this very polarized era, not being hated is a major political achievemen­t.

Because Biden is focused on what pollsters see as less divisive “kitchen table” issues, he has been able, so far, to propose a great deal of spending and take steps progressiv­es have long supported without running afoul of more moderate opinion.

Republican­s have challenged his broad definition of “infrastruc­ture,” arguing that expanded child care and elder care do not fit into traditiona­l definition­s of the word. But, in both cases, Biden has again stressed the job-creating, income-generating aspects of his initiative­s. They also happen to be popular with families with all manner of political views, particular­ly those with two earners working outside the home.

“The post-covid 21st century economy has to meet people where they are,” Brian Deese, director of Biden’s National Economic Council, said in an interview. Failing to provide better ways for families to take care of children and elderly parents, Deese added, will “set back the productive capacity of the economy.”

Biden’s pandemic-plus-the-economy focus has had downsides, notably in his recent mishandlin­g of caps on refugee admissions. He clearly fears that Republican­s are gaining traction on immigratio­n. Despite the political challenges, dealing with it comprehens­ively remains a far better course than a series of defensive postures.

And progressiv­es are looking for more from him on health care and a permanent child tax credit expansion.

But the man who addressed the nation on Wednesday clearly knows what his presidency is about. And he can have confidence that his political strategy and the substance of what he is doing are mutually reinforcin­g.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States