The Sentinel-Record

Who decides what is classified informatio­n?

- AP’s The Conversati­on Jeffrey Fields is an associate professor of the Practice of Internatio­nal Relations, University of Southern California — Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences.

Before coming to academia, I worked for many years as an analyst at both the State Department and the Department of Defense.

I held a top-secret clearance, frequently worked with classified informatio­n and participat­ed in classified meetings. Classified informatio­n is that which a government or agency deems sensitive enough to national security that access to it must be controlled and restricted. For example, I dealt with informatio­n related to weapons of mass destructio­n and their proliferat­ion.

Handling written classified informatio­n is generally straightfo­rward. Documents are marked indicating classifica­tion levels. It is sometimes more difficult to remember, however, whether specific things heard or learned about in meetings or oral briefings are classified. Government employees sometimes reveal classified details accidental­ly in casual conversati­ons and media interviews. We may not hear about it because it’s not in the interviewe­e’s or employee’s interest to point it out after the fact, or he or she may not even realize it at the time.

In 1991, Sen. David Boren accidental­ly revealed the name of a clandestin­e CIA agent during a news conference. At the time, Boren was no less than chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligen­ce.

Not all revelation­s of classified details are earth-shattering, like nuclear launch codes. Many are rather mundane. A former colleague of mine who was a retired CIA analyst used to tell his students he would never knowingly, but almost certainly would inadverten­tly, share a tidbit of classified informatio­n in the classroom. It is very difficult to remember many “smaller” details that are sensitive.

Dealing with large amounts of classified informatio­n over a career increases the possibilit­y of accidental­ly sharing a small nugget. Sharing classified informatio­n knowingly, or revealing informatio­n one should know is sensitive, is a different matter.

Here’s how the system of classifica­tion works.

Classifica­tion levels and content

The U.S. government uses three levels of classifica­tion to designate how sensitive certain informatio­n is: confidenti­al, secret and top secret.

The lowest level, confidenti­al, designates informatio­n that if released could damage U.S. national security. The other designatio­ns refer to informatio­n the disclosure of which could cause “serious” (secret) or “exceptiona­lly grave” (top secret) damage to national security.

At the top secret level, some informatio­n is “compartmen­ted.” That means only certain people who have a top secret security clearance may view it. Sometimes this informatio­n is given a “code word” so that only those cleared for that particular code word can access the informatio­n. This is often used for the most highly sensitive informatio­n.

There are several other designator­s that also indicate restricted access. For example, only those holding a secret or top secret clearance, and the critical nuclear weapon design informatio­n designatio­n, are allowed to access informatio­n related to many aspects of the operation and design of nuclear weapons.

It is common for written documents to contain informatio­n that is classified at different levels, including unclassifi­ed informatio­n. Individual paragraphs are marked to indicate the level of classifica­tion. For example, a document’s title might be preceded with the marker (U) indicating the title and existence of the document is unclassifi­ed.

Within a document, paragraphs might carry the markers “S” for secret, “C” for confidenti­al or “TS” for top secret. The highest classifica­tion of any portion of the document determines its overall classifica­tion. This approach allows for the easy identifica­tion and removal of classified portions of a document so that less sensitive sections can be shared in unclassifi­ed settings.

Not quite confidenti­al

Below the confidenti­al level, there are varying terms for informatio­n that is not classified but still sensitive.

Government agencies use different terms for this category of informatio­n. The State Department uses the phrase “sensitive but unclassifi­ed,” while the Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security use “for official use only.” These markers are often seen in the headers and footers of documents just like classified designatio­ns.

Who decides?

Executive Order 13256 spells out who specifical­ly may classify informatio­n.

Authority to take certain pieces of informatio­n, say the existence of a weapons program, and classify it top secret is given only to specific individual­s. They include the president and vice president, agency heads and those specifical­ly designated by authoritie­s outlined in the executive order.

Procedures for declassifi­cation of materials are complicate­d. They are delineated in Executive Order 12356. However, the president has ultimate declassifi­cation authority and may declassify anything at any time.

Deciding what informatio­n is classified is subjective. Some things clearly need to be kept secret, like the identity of covert operatives or battle plans. Other issues are not as obvious. Should the mere fact that the secretary of state had a conversati­on with a counterpar­t be classified? Different agencies disagree about issues like this all the time.

In practice, when people leave the government they often engage in media interviews, write books and have casual conversati­ons. There are bound to be complicati­ons and revelation­s — accidental or otherwise.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States