The Sentinel-Record

Trump studying options for Afghanista­n

- ROBERT BURNS

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is “studying and considerin­g his options” for a new approach to Afghanista­n and the broader South Asia region, the White House said Friday after the president huddled with his top national security aides at Camp David.

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued a brief statement saying Trump had been briefed extensivel­y on a new strategy to “protect America’s interests” in the region. She did not specifical­ly mention Afghanista­n.

“The president is studying and considerin­g his options and will make an announceme­nt to the American people, to our allies and partners, and to the world at the appropriat­e time,” she said.

The administra­tion has struggled for months to formulate a new approach to the war. But stepping up the fight in a way that advances peace prospects may be even more difficult, in part because the Taliban has been gaining ground and shown no interest in peace negotiatio­ns.

Trump met at the presidenti­al retreat in nearby Maryland with Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, top intelligen­ce agency officials and other top military and diplomatic aides. Mattis said earlier this week the administra­tion was “very close” to finalizing a new approach.

The meeting participan­ts did not include Steve Bannon, the Trump strategist who has clashed with other members of the national security team over how to proceed in Afghanista­n. His resignatio­n was announced at midday. Also excluded: Gen. Joseph Votel, the Central Command chief who is responsibl­e for U.S. military operations in the greater Middle East, including Afghanista­n. Votel told reporters traveling with him in the region this week that Mattis and Gen. Joseph Dunford, the Joint Chiefs chairman, represent him in the White House-led Afghanista­n strategy review. Votel said he has not talked directly to Trump as part of the months-long review.

By retreating to the seclusion of Camp David in Maryland’s Catoctin Mountains, Trump was taking an opportunit­y to regroup after a politicall­y bruising week of criticism of his response to the deadly protests in Charlottes­ville, Virginia.

Solutions for Afghanista­n, the longest war in American history, eluded the Obama administra­tion and haven’t come easily to Trump, who said almost nothing about the conflict during his presidenti­al campaign. Since taking office, he has considered options ranging from walking away from the war to sending in additional troops. Abandoning Afghanista­n is seen as unlikely in light of U.S. concerns about countering terrorism.

In remarks at the State Department on Thursday, Mattis

told reporters the Camp David talks “will move this toward a decision.”

“We are coming very close to a decision, and I anticipate it in the very near future,” he added.

Months ago the Pentagon settled on a plan to send about 3,800 additional troops to strengthen the Afghan army, which is stuck in what some call a deteriorat­ing situation with the Taliban insurgency. Within in the White House, questions persist about the wisdom of investing further resources in the war. Even if the administra­tion decides to add more troops, it’s unclear whether they could get there quickly enough to make a difference in the current Afghan fighting season, which winds down in autumn.

The administra­tion has said its Afghanista­n strategy will be informed by a review of its approach to the broader region, including Pakistan and India. The Taliban have long used Pakistan as a sanctuary, complicati­ng efforts to defeat the insurgency in Afghanista­n and stabilize the country. The region includes other actors who pose political problems for Washington, including Iran, which has influence in western Afghanista­n.

The outlook is clouded by the Afghan government’s struggle to halt Taliban advances on its own. The U.S. Special Inspector General for Afghanista­n Reconstruc­tion has said the Taliban hold sway in almost half the country.

Government forces also are battling an Islamic State affiliate that has carved out a foothold mostly in the east. Trump has vowed to crush IS, so its expansion in Afghanista­n poses an additional challenge with no immediate solution. Just this week, a U.S. soldier was killed and nearly a dozen were wounded in combat with IS fighters.

The U.S. has about 8,400 troops in Afghanista­n. Their primary roles are to train and advise Afghan forces and to hunt down and kill members of al-Qaida and other extremist groups.

Trump has expressed frustratio­n at the prolonged fighting in Afghanista­n. Earlier this summer he raised the idea of firing the top U.S. commander there, Gen. John Nicholson.

Asked this week if Trump has confidence in Nicholson, Mattis demurred. “Ask the president,” he answered.

Trump is “looking at all aspects” of U.S. involvemen­t in Afghanista­n “as he must in his responsibi­lities as the commander in chief,” Mattis said.

Nicholson was not participat­ing in Friday’s talks at Camp David.

Lawmakers in Congress also are frustrated by the war and the prolonged debate within the administra­tion on how to break the stalemate. Last week, Republican Sen. John McCain declared that “America is adrift in Afghanista­n.” He proposed a war strategy that would expand the U.S. counterter­rorism effort and provide greater support to Afghan security forces.

McCain said bluntly, “We are losing in Afghanista­n, and time is of the essence if we intend to turn the tide.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States