The Sentinel-Record

Abandoning Puerto Rico an impeachabl­e offense

-

WASHINGTON — More than 80 percent of Puerto Rico is still in the dark, more than a third of its residents still have no clean drinking water, much of the island’s infrastruc­ture still lies in ruins — and President Trump cruelly threatens to cut off federal aid. Doing so would be government by spite, and should be considered an impeachabl­e offense.

Puerto Rico, as any fifth-grader knows, is part of the America that Trump promises to make great again. But the mayor of San Juan has had the temerity to criticize the Trump administra­tion’s response to the calamity of Hurricane Maria as slow and inadequate. For Trump, everything is always all about Trump. He desperatel­y craves adulation.

The president complained Sunday on Twitter, “Nobody could have done what I’ve done for #PuertoRico with so little appreciati­on. So much work!” Note the use of “I” instead of “we” or even “my administra­tion.” For the record, what Trump has done personally for the people of Puerto Rico was to playfully toss rolls of paper towels into a crowd.

The administra­tion has done much more, of course. But desperate people — still facing critical shortages of food and water three weeks after the storm — are demanding more action. This makes them “ingrates” in Trump’s eyes.

Sadly, those are the kinds of words we’ve come to expect from this president. But on Thursday he went beyond his usual self-pitying, self-justifying blather to make an outrageous threat: “We cannot keep FEMA, the Military & the First Responders, who have been amazing (under the most difficult circumstan­ces) in P.R. forever!”

That culminated a series of blame-the-victim tweets about how Puerto Rico faces “a financial crisis … largely of their own making” and how “electric and all infrastruc­ture was [a] disaster before hurricanes.” The need to solve the island’s debt problem and update its infrastruc­ture is worthy of serious discussion, but not while people are having to collect unpurified water in buckets from mountain springs — and not as some kind of justificat­ion for cutting off relief aid.

This may be the most un-American thing Donald Trump has ever said or done. I am serious that if he were to actually withdraw emergency assistance while Puerto Rico is still in such condition, Congress should begin impeachmen­t proceeding­s.

Presidents do not get to pick and choose which Americans to help at times of disaster. We are one country, and we do what we must to help fellow citizens in need. We saw it during this long, terrible hurricane season, in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Texas, Florida — strangers helping strangers, regardless of race, income, political views. We are seeing it now as firefighte­rs from around the country converge on Northern California to attack the deadly blazes that are still burning out of control.

It is wrong to describe Trump as any kind of nationalis­t if he fails to grasp the most fundamenta­l of nationalis­tic precepts: We leave none of our own on the battlefiel­d.

The responsibi­lity of the federal government is to keep FEMA workers, military personnel and other first responders in Puerto Rico as long as necessary. It is important to do so because their presence will save lives. It is also important because doing anything else would violate the American compact. If Trump really were to turn his back on Puerto Rico, he would be guilty of a “high crime” and disqualifi­ed to continue in office.

I know that President Trump delights in violating political norms and causing the commentari­at to run around with its hair on fire. I know that he sometimes says provocativ­e things on Twitter to distract from his administra­tion’s failures, to rally his base, to provoke his enemies or even just to blow off steam. I know that it’s impossible to take any one tweet too seriously, since it may be directly contradict­ed by the next tweet.

But Trump actually went to Puerto Rico, and while he did not see the worst of the devastatio­n, he saw more than enough. He knows that recovery is going to be a long, massive and largely thankless job. But that is the job he signed up for when he took the oath of office. Congress must not allow him to shirk his duty.

To divide the country with rhetoric, as Trump so often does, is one thing. But to actually abandon 3.4 million Americans in their hour of need would not only be an unpreceden­ted and shameful act. It would be grounds for removing an unfit man from the high office he dishonors.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States