The Sentinel-Record

$2B at risk in suspension of aid to Pakistan

- JOSH LEDERMAN AND MATTHEW PENNINGTON

WASHINGTON — Up to $2 billion in U.S. aid could be affected by President Donald Trump’s suspension of security assistance to Pakistan, which is accused of failing to crack down on Taliban militants targeting U.S. personnel in neighborin­g Afghanista­n, a senior U.S. administra­tion official said Friday.

Those funds comprise about $1 billion in planned military assistance, including the $255 million in foreign military financing that was put on hold in August, and an additional $900 million in Coalition Support Funds intended to reimburse Pakistan for counterter­rorism operations, said the official, who was not authorized to comment by name and demanded anonymity.

Washington’s announceme­nt Thursday signaled growing frustratio­n over Pakistan’s level of cooperatio­n as U.S. involvemen­t in the war in Afghanista­n enters its 17th year. The abrupt move met with an indignant response from Islamabad, which says it is being scapegoate­d, and has faced thousands of casualties and more than $120 billion in costs in the war on terror.

“Arbitrary deadlines, unilateral pronouncem­ents and shifting goalposts are counterpro­ductive in addressing common threats,” Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement Friday.

As recently as October, Trump credited U.S.-Pakistani cooperatio­n for winning the release of a Canadian-American family held for five years by militants from the Haqqani network — a Taliban faction that stages attacks in Afghanista­n.

It remains to be seen how the U.S. decision will affect the long-fraught relations with Pakistan, which has increasing­ly turned to China for economic assistance and military equipment.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said that he is not concerned that Pakistan will turn to China to fill the vacuum, nor shut down the borders or curtail America’s ability to use ground or air crossings to get supplies into and out of Afghanista­n. During high tension six years ago, Pakistan closed overland routes into Afghanista­n for several months.

The U.S., Mattis said, is still “working with Pakistan and we would restore the aid if we see decisive movements against the terrorists who are as much of a threat against Pakistan as they are against us.”

Trump telegraphe­d a tougher U.S. approach to Pakistan on Monday, when he tweeted that the U.S. had “foolishly” given Pakistan more than $33 billion in aid in the last 15 years and had gotten nothing in return but “lies & deceit.” He reiterated longstandi­ng allegation­s that Pakistan gives “safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanista­n.”

State Department spokeswoma­n Heather Nauert said Thursday that despite sustained high-level engagement with Pakistan’s government since Trump unveiled a South Asia strategy in August, “the Taliban and Haqqani network continue to find sanctuary inside Pakistan as they plot to destabiliz­e Afghanista­n and attack U.S. and allied personnel.” She told reporters that until Pakistan takes “decisive action” against those groups, security assistance was suspended.

The administra­tion official said the U.S. may make exceptions to satisfy critical U.S. national security interests. Civilian developmen­t and economic assistance to Pakistan is not affected.

The State Department also accused Pakistan of severe violations of religious freedom. It announced that it was placing Pakistan on a special watch list, pursuant to 2016 legislatio­n. The step does not carry any serious consequenc­es, although it could lead to sanctions if Pakistan is further relegated to a U.S. list of “countries of particular concern.” Washington has criticized the majority-Muslim nation over its blasphemy legislatio­n and treatment of religious minorities

Pakistan’s Foreign Ministry objected that the watch list designatio­n was not based on “objective criteria.”

U.S. assistance to Pakistan, which rose sharply after the 9/11 attacks, has been declining since 2011 when American commandos killed Osama bin Laden inside Pakistan, straining relations.

Michael Kugelman, deputy director of the Wilson Center’s South Asia program, said suspension of U.S. security assistance to Pakistan would not torpedo relations but it was a significan­t step backward. There are risks for Washington, as Pakistan could potentiall­y curtail intelligen­ce cooperatio­n and U.S. supply lines into Afghanista­n, he said.

Mattis said the U.S. and Pakistan have had “strong disagreeme­nts on some issues and we’re working those - the specific individual things we’re doing are best handled in private to ensure that we can be most productive.”

He cautioned, however, that it will take time.

“It’s going to take years for all of this to play out,” said Mattis.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States