The Sentinel-Record

The Rev. Billy Graham was consumed by grace

- Micheal Gerson

WASHINGTON — Billy Graham was easily the most influentia­l evangelica­l Christian of the 20th century — a man at home in the historical company of George Whitefield and John Wesley.

But this would be hard to tell from reading his sermons, which even close associates described as ordinary. His books are hardly more memorable. So what was it that compelled hundreds of millions of people to attend and watch his evangelist­ic “crusades” and to find personal transforma­tion in his words?

Graham’s global ministry was the triumph of complete sincerity, expressed with a universall­y accessible simplicity. “There is no magic, no manipulati­on,” said publicist Gavin Reid.

“The man just obviously believes what he says.” Graham could display charisma in meetings with presidents and queens. In the pulpit

— the place of his calling from an early age — he was nearly transparen­t, allowing a light behind him to shine through him. He had the power of a man utterly confident in some other, greater power.

American fundamenta­lism from the Scopes monkey trial to the 1950s was traumatize­d, marginaliz­ed and inward-looking. Graham’s achievemen­t was to turn the face of fundamenta­lism outward toward the world — shaping, in the process, a distinct religious movement. His evangelica­lism was more open and appealing, more intellectu­ally and culturally engaged. Graham took his fellow evangelica­ls from the margins to the center — from the sawdust trail to the White House. He managed to be winsome without being compromise­d. And evangelica­l Christians felt grateful to have a public representa­tive who — through his integrity and consistenc­y — brought credit to their faith.

There was initial resistance to Graham’s work among mainline Protestant­s. As Graham announced more and more crusades, theologian Reinhold Niebuhr was not amused. Graham, Niebuhr warned, would “accentuate every prejudice which the modern, ‘enlightene­d’ but morally sensitive man may have against religion.” Graham responded: “I have read nearly everything Mr. Niebuhr has written and I feel inadequate before his brilliant mind and learning. Occasional­ly I get a glimmer of what he is talking about … (but) if I tried to preach as he writes, people would be so bewildered they would walk out.”

Nearly 2 million people walked into Graham’s 16-week, New York crusade in 1957. And Graham was joined one night at Madison Square Garden by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

There was also resistance among some fundamenta­lists. I grew up in a theologica­lly conservati­ve Calvinist church in which the reformatio­n was refought on a weekly basis. The man who would become my father-in-law — blessed with a fine voice — decided to sing in the choir at a Billy Graham crusade that came into town. Afterward, he was hauled in front of the elders of the church to be questioned. They were upset at this participat­ion because Graham — when people would come forward during the altar call — would refer them back to their home churches, including Catholic churches.

In fact, the tone of Graham’s public voice changed over the years, becoming more ecumenical, less harsh and nationalis­tic. Some of this he credited to broader exposure to the world. “I think now when I say something, ‘How is this going to sound in India? How is it going to sound to my friends in Hungary or Poland?’” But this also involved a theologica­l shift. “I used to believe that pagans in far countries were lost if they did not have the gospel of Christ preached to them,” he reflected in 1978. “I no longer believe that.”

His faith in the essentials of the Christian gospel, however, never changed. And it made him into a busy builder of institutio­ns that still carry the Christian message. Graham was instrument­al in the founding of Christiani­ty Today, the Billy Graham Center at Wheaton College and Gordon-Conwell Theologica­l Seminary. He was a major supporter of the National Associatio­n of Evangelica­ls and Fuller Theologica­l Seminary.

As in any long, public life, there were low moments, particular­ly when Graham came into contact with political figures such as Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. But he also had a powerful, positive influence in the life of the young George W. Bush and countless others. And this much is clear. For Graham, faith was not the instrument to some other end; it was the prize itself. He had no ulterior motives. No trace of cynicism. He was consumed by grace, and spoke in gratitude.

For a Christian, it is not a small thing for a man to talk about Jesus Christ, face to face, to more people than anyone has ever done. Or to see how remarkably God used his servant Billy, just as he was.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States