The Sentinel-Record

Confusion and uncertaint­y at the border after Trump acts

- NOMAAN MERCHANT SUSAN MONTOYA BRYAN

McALLEN, Texas — The U.S. government wrestled with the ramificati­ons Thursday of President Donald Trump’s move to stop separating families at the border, with no clear plan to reunite the more than 2,300 children already taken from their parents and Congress again failing to take action on immigratio­n reform.

In a day of confusion and conflictin­g reports, the Trump administra­tion began drawing up plans to house as many as 20,000 migrants on U.S. military bases. But officials gave differing accounts as to whether those beds would be for children or for entire families.

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson says he’s opposed to the federal government using any facilities in the state to house migrant children who are separated from their parents.

Hutchinson said Thursday he understand­s that officials are looking at the Little Rock Air Force Base and unused federal land in south Arkansas to house immigrants and that the decision on using the facilities is being made in Washington and not at the state level.

Hutchinson says any costs for housing immigrant families would be paid by the federal government.

At the same time, the Justice Department went to court in an attempt to overturn a decades-old settlement that limits to 20 days the amount of time migrant children can be locked up with their families.

Democratic mayors and religious leaders, meanwhile, traveled to the border to step up pressure on the White House over its hardline immigratio­n policies.

And in the Texas border city of McAllen, federal prosecutor­s unexpected­ly did not pursue charges against 17 immigrants. A federal prosecutor said “there was no prosecutio­n sought” in light of Trump’s executive order ending the practice of separating families.

It was unclear whether that meant the Trump administra­tion was dropping its monthsold “zero tolerance” policy of prosecutin­g all adults caught trying to enter the country illegally.

The president did not answer the question directly but showed no sign of softening.

“We have to be very, very strong on the border. If we don’t do it, you will be inundated with people and you really won’t have a country,” Trump said.

The uncertaint­y resulted from the abrupt ending Wednesday of a White House policy that separated more than 2,300 children from their parents over the past several weeks. The practice set off an outcry from all corners of the world, with the images and sounds of crying children dominating the news.

After Trump’s executive order, a host of unanswered questions remained, including what will happen to the children already separated from their parents and where the government will house all the newly detained migrants, with the system already bursting at the seams.

Officials from the Defense Department and Health and Human Services said the Pentagon has agreed to provide space on military bases to hold up to 20,000 people detained after illegally crossing the Mexican border.

It was unclear which bases would be used. But HHS has assessed four as prospectiv­e housing for children: Fort Bliss, Goodfellow Air Force Base and Dyess Air Force Base in Texas, and Little Rock Air Force Base in Arkansas.

The Justice Department asked a federal judge to change the rules regarding the detention of immigrant children, seeking permission to detain them for longer than the permitted 20 days in an effort to keep them together with their parents.

Meanwhile, the mayors of about 20 U.S. cities gathered at a holding facility for immigrant children in the border city of El Paso. They accused Trump of failing to address a crisis of his own making.

They called for the immediate reunificat­ion of immigrant children with their families.

“This is a humanitari­an crisis,” Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan said.

In Washington, the House killed a hard-right immigratio­n bill Thursday and Republican leaders delayed a planned vote on a compromise GOP package, with party members fiercely divided on the issue. Democrats oppose both measures.

The rejected bill would have curbed legal immigratio­n and bolstered border security but would not have granted a pathway to citizenshi­p to “Dreamers” who arrived in the country illegally as children.

The delayed vote was on a compromise bill between GOP moderates and conservati­ves that would offer Dreamers a pathway to citizenshi­p and provide $25 billion for Trump’s border wall, among other things.

Elsewhere, Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam of Virginia ordered an investigat­ion into claims by children at an immigratio­n detention facility that they were beaten while handcuffed and locked up for long periods in solitary confinemen­t, left nude and shivering in concrete cells.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States