The Sentinel-Record

5 takeaways from hacking indictment

- MARY CLARE JALONICK

WASHINGTON — As the American presidenti­al election entered the final stretch in 2016, a dozen Russian military intelligen­ce officers were scattered throughout Moscow, unleashing a massive cyber operation to disrupt the vote.

That’s according to an indictment issued Friday that says the officers developed malicious computer code known as malware, hacked into Democratic Party computers and silently watched as unknowing staffers typed.

The Russians stole the Democrats’ secret files. They took snapshots of their screens. They used fake emails to dupe Hillary Clinton’s staffers into exposing their passwords.

And then, the indictment says, the Russians released their stolen informatio­n to the world.

Here’s a look at what’s in the indictment:

HACKING WAS CONNECTED TO HIGHEST LEVELS OF RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT

The indictment said Russia’s Main Intelligen­ce Directorat­e of the General Staff — known as GRU — had multiple units that “conducted large scale cyber operations” to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidenti­al election.

One of the units was based on an unassuming side street in the Moscow suburb of Khimki, in a building referred to within the GRU as the “Tower,” according to the indictment. Another was based near central Moscow, not far from Defense Ministry headquarte­rs.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has consistent­ly asserted that Russia was not involved in the hacking or any attempt to interfere with U.S. elections. But GRU is part of the state machine, and their participat­ion would indicate that Putin was closely involved in the effort.

IT WAS A SOPHISTICA­TED OPERATION

According to the indictment, the Russian hacking operation was so precise that they were able to pinpoint specific computers within the House Democratic campaign arm, the Democratic Congressio­nal Campaign Committee, and the Democratic National Committee that stored informatio­n related to the election. They were able to search the computers for certain terms,

“Hillary,” “Cruz,” and “Trump.” They also copied folders, including opposition research and field operation plans.

The Russians hid their involvemen­t through fake email addresses and identities and a network of computers located around the world — including in the United States. They paid for their infrastruc­ture using cryptocurr­ency.

TRUMP ASKED THE RUSSIANS TO HACK CLINTON — AND THEY DID

The indictment says the Russians used “spearphish­ing” — a technique used to steal passwords or otherwise gain access to computers — throughout the summer of 2016 to hack individual­s associated with the Clinton campaign.

One attempt noted in the indictment appeared to come hours after Donald Trump suggested Russians look for Clinton’s emails. On the morning of July 27, 2016, Trump gave a speech in which he said “Russia, if you’re listening,” he’d love to get a look at the thousands of emails Clinton had said she deleted from her tenure as secretary of state.

The indictment points to a hacking attempt that same day, saying that “after hours” the Russians attempted to “spearphish for the first time email accounts at a domain hosted by a third-party provider and used by Clinton’s personal office.” Around the same time, the indictment says, they targeted 76 email addresses at the Clinton campaign’s domain.

In all, the indictment says the Russians targeted over 300 individual­s associated with the Clinton campaign, the DCCC and the DNC.

RUSSIANS COMMUNICAT­ED WITH A TRUMP-AFFILIATED PERSON

The indictment does not allege that that any Americans, including Trump campaign officials, were knowingly in contact with Russian intelligen­ce officers. But it does say that Russians wrote to an unnamed person “who was in regular contact with senior members of the presidenti­al campaign of Donald J. Trump.”

On August 15, 2016, the Russians wrote, according to the indictment: “thank u for writing back … do u find anyt(h)ing interestin­g in the docs i posted?”

Two days later, the Russians added, “please tell me if i can help u anyhow … it would be a great pleasure to me.”

In September, the Russians wrote the person again and referred to a stolen DCCC document posted online. “What do u think of the info on the turnout model for the democrats entire presidenti­al campaign.”

The person responded, “(p) retty standard,” according to the indictment.

THE RUSSIANS STOLE VOTER INFORMATIO­N

The indictment says the Russians hacked the website of a state board of elections and stole the informatio­n of roughly 500,000 voters, including names, addresses, partial Social Security numbers, dates of birth and driver’s license numbers. They also hacked into a national election vendor that supplied software used to verify voter registrati­on informatio­n.

Federal officials have said state election sites in at least 18 states were probed by the Russians. The indictment adds county offices — specifical­ly in Georgia, Florida and Iowa — to the list of election administra­tion sites they allegedly visited “to identify vulnerabil­ities.”

Department of Homeland Security officials have said there is no evidence of any election results being tampered with during the 2016 intrusions.

 ?? The Associated Press ?? RUSSIAN INTELLIGEN­CE: In this Nov. 8, 2006, file photo, President Vladimir Putin, second right, and Russian President’s special representa­tive on questions of ecology and transport Sergei Ivanov, right, visit the Defense Ministry’s Main Intelligen­ce Directorat­e in Moscow, Russia. The Justice Department announced on Friday charges against 12 Russian intelligen­ce officers for hacking offenses during the 2016 presidenti­al election.
The Associated Press RUSSIAN INTELLIGEN­CE: In this Nov. 8, 2006, file photo, President Vladimir Putin, second right, and Russian President’s special representa­tive on questions of ecology and transport Sergei Ivanov, right, visit the Defense Ministry’s Main Intelligen­ce Directorat­e in Moscow, Russia. The Justice Department announced on Friday charges against 12 Russian intelligen­ce officers for hacking offenses during the 2016 presidenti­al election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States