The Sentinel-Record

Kavanaugh allegation poses political risks for Dems and GOP

- STEVE PEOPLES THOMAS BEAUMONT

NEW YORK — With the fate of President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee suddenly uncertain, emboldened Democrats clashed with cautious Republican­s on Monday as both parties grappled with an increasing­ly messy nomination fight weeks before the pivotal midterm elections.

The political implicatio­ns were still being sorted out. But with control of Congress at stake this fall, there were tremendous risks for both sides.

The GOP risked further alienating female voters — particular­ly in the nation’s sub-

urbs — by embracing Trump’s hand-picked Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, after an allegation surfaced over the weekend of decades-old sexual misconduct. Democrats, who seized on the developmen­t as justificat­ion to delay the high-stakes nomination, could energize complacent Republican voters if they’re viewed as playing politics with the sensitive allegation.

Amid the chaos, a key question quietly emerged among some political operatives: Would Republican­s force through the Kavanaugh nomination even if it jeopardize­s their control of Congress? For some, the short-term political pain might be an acceptable tradeoff for a generation of conservati­ve control on the nation’s high court.

The situation is fluid to say the least.

“At this very moment, the issue is moving so fast that accurate prediction­s are difficult to make,” said Steven Law, who leads the super PAC aligned with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. “I think it’s likely this will inflame partisan energy on both sides.”

Christine Blasey Ford, now a clinical psychology professor at Palo Alto University in California, told The Washington Post that a drunken Kavanaugh groped her and tried to take off her clothes at a party when both were teenagers at high schools in suburban Maryland.

Ford’s attorney said Monday her client was willing to testify publicly about the allegation­s on Capitol Hill, where a key Kavanaugh confirmati­on vote was scheduled this week.

Kavanaugh, now 53, called the allegation “completely false” in a statement, adding that he “had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself” to the Post.

“I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the committee deems appropriat­e to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity,” Kavanaugh said.

The developing situation threatens to exacerbate the GOP’s rocky Trump-era relationsh­ip with suburban women, who are poised to play an outsized role in the districts that will largely decide the House majority this fall. Election Day isn’t until Nov. 6, but early voting begins Friday in Minnesota and in roughly three weeks across several more states.

Vulnerable Republican House incumbents have largely avoided the issue, which flared Monday in northern Virginia’s suburbs, where GOP Rep. Barbara Comstock is fighting for her political survival.

In a written statement, Comstock said Kavanaugh and Ford “should both testify under oath before the Judiciary Committee.” The reaction came as her Democratic challenger, Jennifer Wexton, tweeted: “This is bigger than our politics and will impact whether victims can trust Congress.”

In suburban Denver, vulnerable Republican Rep. Mike Coffman was more cautious. A spokesman said the fiveterm congressma­n “believes the committee and full Senate should thoroughly evaluate the claims and Judge Kavanaugh should address them.”

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said his panel will hold a hearing next Monday with Kavanaugh and Ford. Republican­s were eager to avoid images of Ford facing tough questionin­g from the all-male Republican membership of the Senate panel.

The situation could draw parallels with Justice Clarence Thomas’ 1991 confirmati­on hearings when he faced allegation­s of sexual harassment from Anita Hill. The Senate ultimately confirmed Thomas, though public acceptance of sexual misconduct has shifted dramatical­ly over the last three decades.

Former Vice President Joe Biden, then the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a potential contender for the 2020 Democratic presidenti­al nomination, has been criticized for his handling of Hill’s allegation­s. On Monday, his spokesman, Bill Russo, said Biden “believes Professor Ford deserves a fair and respectful hearing of her allegation­s, and that the Committee should undertake a thorough and non-partisan effort to get to the truth, wherever it leads.”

Some Democrats are using the developmen­t to go on offense.

In Nevada, where Republican Sen. Dean Heller is in a difficult fight for re-election, his Democratic challenger, Rep. Jacky Rosen, used the allegation against Kavanaugh to stoke doubt about Heller’s judgment.

Heller said last week he had “no reservatio­ns” about voting to confirm Kavanaugh. Rosen was quick to suggest in July that Kavanaugh would pose a threat to abortion rights were he to be confirmed.

“If Sen. Heller still has no reservatio­ns about confirming Judge Kavanaugh to a lifetime appointmen­t on the nation’s highest court, then he isn’t listening to Nevadans,” Rosen said in a statement Monday.

And in Tennessee, where Democrat Phil Bredesen is trying to knock off Republican incumbent Sen. Marsha Blackburn, the Democrat insisted that Ford “should be heard.”

“If U.S senators are not going to give a careful and thorough considerat­ion of Supreme Court nominees, then I don’t know what they think their job is,” Bredesen said on Twitter.

Democrats — and some Republican­s — have called for a delay in the nomination process until Ford’s allegation could be investigat­ed further. The developmen­t offered some respite to several vulnerable Democrats who are facing re-election in Republican-leaning states and who had avoided taking a firm position on Kavanaugh’s nomination.

At the same time, Democrats also worked to avoid the perception they were politicizi­ng the situation.

A cautious Indiana Sen. Joe Donnelly, one of the nation’s most endangered Senate Democrats, said the allegation­s “merit further review.”

“Given the nature of these allegation­s, and the number of outstandin­g questions, I believe the Judiciary Committee should hold off on Thursday’s scheduled vote,” he said in a written statement.

While his Republican challenger had little to say about the new allegation­s, West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin said both Ford and Kavanaugh should have an opportunit­y to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee “as quickly as possible.”

“Professor Christine Blasey Ford deserves to be heard and Judge Kavanaugh deserves a chance to clear his name,” Manchin said.

 ?? The Associated Press ?? SWORN IN: In this Sept. 4 file photo, President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is sworn in before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. Both parties are grappling with tremendous political risks in the midst of an increasing­ly messy Supreme Court fight. Republican­s risked alienating women, particular­ly in the nation’s suburbs, by embracing President Trump’s hand-picked nominee even after allegation­s surfaced of decades-old sexual misconduct. Democrats, who want to delay the high-stakes nomination, risked energizing complacent Republican voters should they play politics with the sensitive allegation­s.
The Associated Press SWORN IN: In this Sept. 4 file photo, President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh is sworn in before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. Both parties are grappling with tremendous political risks in the midst of an increasing­ly messy Supreme Court fight. Republican­s risked alienating women, particular­ly in the nation’s suburbs, by embracing President Trump’s hand-picked nominee even after allegation­s surfaced of decades-old sexual misconduct. Democrats, who want to delay the high-stakes nomination, risked energizing complacent Republican voters should they play politics with the sensitive allegation­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States