The Sentinel-Record

Trump targets citizenshi­p, stokes pre-election migrant fears

- CATHERINE LUCEY, JILL COLVIN AND COLLEEN LONG

WASHINGTON — Thousands of U.S. troops to stop an “invasion” of migrants. Tent cities for asylum seekers. An end for the Constituti­on’s guarantee of birthright citizenshi­p.

With his eyes squarely on next Tuesday’s elections, President Donald Trump is rushing out hardline immigratio­n declaratio­ns, promises and actions as he tries to mobilize supporters to retain Republican control of Congress. His own campaign in 2016 concentrat­ed on border fears, and that’s his final-week focus in the midterm fight.

“This has nothing to do with elections,” the president insists. But his timing is striking.

Trump says he will send more than 5,000 military troops to the Mexican border to help defend against caravans of Central American migrants who are on foot hundreds of miles away. Tent cities would not resolve the massive U.S. backlog of asylum seekers. And most legal scholars say it would take a new constituti­onal amendment to alter the current one granting citizenshi­p to anyone born in America.

Still, Trump plunges ahead with daily alarms and proclamati­ons about immigratio­n in tweets, interviews and policy announceme­nts in the days leading up to elections that Democrats hope will give them at least partial control of Congress.

Trump and many top aides have long seen the immigratio­n issue as the most effective rallying cry for his base of supporters. The president had been expected to make an announceme­nt about new actions at the border on Tuesday, but that was scrapped so he could travel instead to Pittsburgh, where 11 people were massacred in a synagogue on Saturday.

Between the shootings, the deadliest attack on Jews in U.S. history, and the mail bomb scare targeting Democrats and a media organizati­on, the caravan of migrants slowly trudging north had faded from front pages and cable TV.

But with well-timed interviews on Fox and “Axios on HBO,” Trump revived some of his

hardest-line immigratio­n ideas:

— An executive order to revoke the right to citizenshi­p for babies born to non-U.S. citizens on American soil.

— And the prolonged detention of anyone coming across the U.S.-Mexico border, including those seeking asylum, in “tent cities” erected “all over the place.”

The administra­tion on Monday also announced plans to deploy 5,200 active duty troops — double the 2,000 who are in Syria fighting the Islamic State group — to the border to help stave off the caravans.

The main caravan, still in southern Mexico, was continuing to melt away — from the original 7,000 to about 4,000 — as a smaller group apparently hoped to join it.

Trump insists his immigratio­n moves have nothing to do with politics, even as he rails against the caravans at campaign rallies.

“I’ve been saying this long before the election. I’ve been saying this before I ever thought of running for office. We have to have strong borders,” Trump told Fox News host Laura Ingraham in an interview Monday.

Critics weren’t buying it. “They’re playing all of us,” said David W. Leopold, an immigratio­n attorney and counsel to the immigratio­n advocacy group America’s Voice. “This is not about locking people up. This is not about birthright citizenshi­p. This is about winning an election next week.”

Trump’s citizenshi­p proposal would inevitably spark a longshot legal battle over whether the president can alter the long-accepted understand­ing that the 14th Amendment grants citizenshi­p to any child born on U.S. soil, regardless of his parents’ immigratio­n status.

Omar Jadwat, director of the Immigrants’ Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union in New York, said the Constituti­on is very clear.

“If you are born in the United States, you’re a citizen,” he said. He called it “outrageous that the president can think he can override constituti­onal guarantees by issuing an executive order,

James Ho, a conservati­ve Trump-appointed federal appeals court judge, wrote in 2006, before his appointmen­t, that birthright citizenshi­p “is protected no less for children of undocument­ed persons than for descendant­s of Mayflower passengers.”

Even House Speaker Paul Ryan, typically a supporter of Trump proposals, said on WVLK radio in Kentucky: “Well you obviously cannot do that. You cannot end birthright citizenshi­p with an executive order.”

But Trump says he’s been assured by his lawyers that the change could be made with “just with an executive order” — an argument he has been making since his early days as a candidate, when he dubbed birthright citizenshi­p a “magnet for illegal immigratio­n” and pledged to end it.

“We’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentiall­y a citizen of the United States,” he said in an Axios interview excerpt released Tuesday.

Not so, according to a 2010 study from the Center for Immigratio­n Studies, a group that supports immigratio­n restrictio­ns, that said at least 30 countries offered birthright citizenshi­p.

Vice President Mike Pence said the administra­tion was “looking at action that would reconsider birthright citizenshi­p.”

“We all know what the 14th Amendment says. We all cherish the language of the 14th Amendment. But the Supreme Court of the United States has never ruled on whether or not — whether the language of the 14th Amendment, subject to the jurisdicti­on thereof, applies specifical­ly to the people who are in the country illegally,” he said at a Politico event.

The non-partisan Migration Policy Institute estimates that there are more than 4 million U.S.-born children under the age of 18 who have an unauthoriz­ed immigrant parent.

A person familiar with the internal White House debate said the topic of birthright citizenshi­p has come up inside the West Wing at various times — and not without some detractors. However, White House lawyers expect to work with the Justice Department to develop a legal justificat­ion for the action. The person was not authorized to discuss the policy debate so spoke on condition of anonymity.

In Trump’s Monday interview with Fox, he said the U.S. also plans to build tent cities to house migrants seeking asylum, who would be detained until their cases were completed. Right now, some asylum seekers, particular­ly families, are being released as their cases progress because there isn’t enough detention space to house them.

“We’re going to put tents up all over the place,” Trump said. “They’re going to be very nice, and they’re going to wait, and if they don’t get asylum they get out.”

The country is facing a massive backlog of immigratio­n cases — some 700,000 — and there are more and more families coming across the border from Central America — groups who cannot be simply returned over the border. But experts question the legality and practicali­ty of what would amount to indefinite detention.

The options are just two of many possibilit­ies currently under discussion, including asylum law changes and simply barring members of the migrant caravans from entering the country using the same mechanism as the president’s much-publicized travel ban for people from certain Muslim countries.

Administra­tion officials say decisions are unlikely until after the midterm elections, in part because of the synagogue shooting and pipe-bomb scare.

But some supporters in Congress are rushing to cheer Trump on.

GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, who has introduced legislatio­n to end birthright citizenshi­p, said Trump was deftly seizing on an issue that was sure to help in the midterms.

“That ability to move on instinct without hesitation, that’s why he’s president,” King said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States