The Sentinel-Record

Lessons my father taught me about being thankful

- Copyright 2018, Washington Post Writers group Daniel Krauthamme­r Daniel Krauthamme­r, the son of Charles Krauthamme­r, is the editor of Charles Krauthamme­r’s book “The Point of It All,” which will be published in December.

WASHINGTON — Thirty-three years ago, my father published a column that explored the meaning of Thanksgivi­ng — beyond cranberry sauce, pumpkin pie and pigskin. Reading that column, which is featured in his forthcomin­g posthumous book, “The Point of It All,” prompted me to contemplat­e some of the most important ideas he introduced into my life, which now occupy my heart and my mind on this holiday.

Thanksgivi­ng is a religious occasion, my father wrote, but not one belonging to “Protestant­ism or Juda- ism or any other particular­ist faith.” Rather, it belongs to all Americans as part of “what has been called the American Civil Religion.”

This religion’s “Supreme Being,” my father wrote,

“is Jefferson’s rights-giving Creator, Washington’s First Author, Lincoln’s Judge — an American Providence.”

The only orthodoxy it demands is belief in the core principles laid out in its foundation­al holy texts: Most important, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienabl­e Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” And “That to secure these rights, Government­s are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

It is important to recognize that we are speaking here about belief. Not proof, but faith. Our founding documents declare “these truths to be self-evident.” But are they? What, exactly, is so “self-evident” about them? One cannot empiricall­y prove that “all men are created equal” or that the purpose of government is to protect individual rights and human liberty. These are moral and metaphysic­al assertions that operate on a separate plane from scientific inquiry.

They are self-evident, ultimately, because we believe that they are. Or because we believe in a God — whether biblical or not, literal or metaphoric­al or perhaps, like Jefferson’s or Einstein’s God, one and the same with the laws of nature — who decrees that they are. And, ultimately, this is a distinctio­n without a difference. Either way, what lies at the foundation of the American experiment, our democracy, our very way of life, is an article of faith.

It is by no means the only possible political faith. For most of human history, no one believed in these propositio­ns. Indeed, no one had even conceived of them. We forget how revolution­ary these principles were at the time of the American founding, and even for centuries afterward. Until the late 20th century, liberal democracy was an exceedingl­y rare (and usually short-lived) phenomenon. For millennia, it appeared “self-evident” to most of humanity that the legitimacy of government­s flowed from the divine right of kings, or the inherent superiorit­y of a feudal aristocrac­y, or the enlightene­d wisdom of a theocratic priesthood. In the last century, totalitari­an ideologies of left and right built regimes whose claims to legitimacy rested on the complete sublimatio­n of individual worth to the deified class or race collective. And still today, authoritar­ians around the world bolster their support by championin­g the power of national and ethnic groups above the rights of the citizen.

In our own politics, no force prevents our leaders or our electorate from choosing to believe that the “self-evident” and highest purpose of our government should be, say, to “make America great again” or to achieve “social justice.” That is not to say those goals are unworthy (depending on how they are defined). But if our system is to endure, they must remain subordinat­e to the primary principles of democratic self-government.

The alternativ­e ideologies all offer a predefined and unifying cause that serves a purpose greater than the self. At each of their cores lies a quasi-religious belief in the absolute and unquestion­ed rightness of that cause, whether it be the glory of king or country or the righteous struggle of one collective tribal identity against another.

In contrast, democracy is not a natural unifier. It allows — indeed, it requires — individual­s to choose their own destinies. “Democracy,” my father wrote, “is designed at its core to be spirituall­y empty,” for “it mandates means (elections, parliament­s, markets) but not ends. Democracy leaves the goals of life entirely up to the individual. Where [as] the totalitari­an state decrees life’s purposes.” As a result, democracy is at once “the most free, most humane, most decent political system ever invented by man,” and also “the most banal. Dying for it is far more ennobling than living it.” And paradoxica­lly, my father argued, this is exactly the point: “the glories yielded by such a successful politics lie outside itself. Its deepest purpose is to create the conditions for the cultivatio­n of the finer things.”

Democracy’s extraordin­ary gift — freedom — is therefore also a burden. It is not easy to define and pursue one’s own path and purpose in life, especially if we feel alone in that endeavor. We need social bonds that unite us in common cause while maintainin­g the political structures that guarantee our liberty. This is the vital role served by America’s civil religion. Its traditions, its ceremonies, its symbols and even its holidays give physical form, emotional weight and devotional object to a set of ideas that could otherwise remain coldly theoretica­l and inaccessib­le to the spiritual heart of our human nature. Its practice, my father wrote, was meant “to infuse communal life with a religious dimension. … Its purpose was to make of the social contract not merely a convention but a faith.” For a political creed built on the sanctity of the individual, the kind of fellowship and connection forged through these traditions of communal devotion is crucial.

And what better symbol for communal devotion could there be than the Thanksgivi­ng table? It was Abraham Lincoln who establishe­d Thanksgivi­ng as an annual national holiday. And it was he, of all our presidents, who most powerfully imbued our politics with a higher spiritual purpose: He urged that “to the support of the Declaratio­n of Independen­ce, so to the support of the Constituti­on and Laws, let every American pledge his life, his property, and his sacred honor. … In short, let it become the political religion of the nation.”

On this day, we give thanks for our country’s natural bounty — but even more, for its moral and philosophi­cal bounty, of which we are history’s lucky inheritors. Our gratitude should prompt us to accept the responsibi­lity for safeguardi­ng it and passing it down to the next generation so that they may continue to enjoy its blessings. On this day, I am thankful to my father for passing it down to me.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States